Home Builder Developer - Interior Renovation and Design

CANTON Many Stark County property owners are set to receive their 2022 property tax bills in the mail this week.

Payments for the first half of the year are due by Feb. 23 at the Stark County Treasurer's office. The second half payment is due July 20. The first-half deadline for taxes on manufactured homes are due by March 8.

Property owners who fail to pay on time will be assessedinterest and a state-mandated penalty of 5% of the amount due for up to 10 days after the deadline and 10% of the amount after that.

More: Nearly 1,400 in Stark County file informal appeals of their new property values

More: Stark County housing market boom raising home values: See the change in your area on a map

Stark County Treasurer Alex Zumbar said the county's vendor PPI Graphics was to deliver 198,000 property tax bills to the U.S. Postal Service facilities in Cleveland by Monday.

About 56,000 of those mailings are informational notices to property owners where their mortgage lender has arranged an escrow service to pay property taxes for them. Zumbar said the cost of the mailing, which is required by state law, is roughly $100,000 a year.

Property owners who don't want to wait can check their bills online. They can go to the Stark County Auditor's Real Estate Search and look up their property by name (data format is last name and then first name without a comma), address or parcel number. They then click on the "Go" button on the right side under "Printable Tax Bill" under "Reports." The word "processing" will appear and if the property owner has disabled the browser popup blocker, the tax bill will appear in a separate browser tab.

Zumbar said by law, property owners are legally required to pay their property taxes by the deadline even if they don't receive a bill in the mail.

The county has four methods by which taxpayers can pay their bills without additional cost. He asks taxpayers to write the parcel numbers of the properties they're paying taxes for on all checks and money orders.

They can pay their bill in person by check, money order or cash at the Stark County Treasurer's Office on the second floor of the county office building,110 Central Plaza, Suite 250. Those who do this are asked but not required to wear a mask.

They can submit with their tax bill stub a payment by check and leave it in the dropbox of the lobby, whichis open 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. weekdays.

Taxpayers can also sign up in advance for a prepayment program, which involves 10 payments debited from a bank account per year. It's too late to sign up for payments due in 2022. Contact treasurer's employee Rick Reigle at (330) 451-7814, extension 7824 or email him at rlreigle@starkcountyohio.gov.

Taxpayers can also sign up in advance for two payments debited from their bank accounts in February and July. Call Richard Willaman at (330) 451-7814, extension 7819 or email him at rcwillaman@starkcountohio.gov.

Taxpayers can mail their payment and incur the cost of postage. The payment must be postmarked by the deadline. And postal meter postmarks aren't considered valid. The address if mailing prior to the due date is: Stark County Treasurer, P.O. Box 24815, Canton, OH, 44701-4815. If mailing after the due date, mail to: Stark County Treasurer, 110 Central Plaza S, Suite 250, Canton, OH, 44702-1410.

Zumbar said due to the U.S. Postal Service's delivery woes a year ago, some payments mailed by the deadline from out of the county were notreceived until June. Otherswere lost. He said any tax penalties assessed in those situations were reversed.

Taxpayers can also pay by credit card or debit card by phone by calling 1-877-690-3729 and using jurisdiction code 4518. The fee is 2.35%. The payments must be divided into one for each parcel. For the same fee, taxpayers can pay by credit card or debit card online at the Treasurer's website. If taxpayers pay online by electronic check and submittheir routing and account numbers for their bank account, the fee is a flat $1.95.

The last payment option is to submit payment at one of three kiosks. The fees are the same as if paying online. The kiosks are at:

The Stark County Auditor's office last year completed the county's triennial update where county appraisers using computer software updated home values to reflect the housing market. Stark County Auditor Alan Harold told the Stark County commissioners Monday morning that residential property values in the county increased by a median 17 to 18%, reflecting booming demand in 2021 for houses.

With new levies approved by voters in 2020 and 2021 taking effect this year and the higher valuations, Harold said, property tax bills this year are up about an average of 8% from a year ago.

Reach Robert at (330) 580-8327 or robert.wang@cantonrep.com. On Twitter: @rwangREP

Excerpt from:
Property tax bills start landing in mailboxes this week - Canton Repository

These days, the presence of cooperatives across the United States is nearly universal. The largest sector is financial cooperatives, better known as credit unions. As of September 30, 2021, the National Credit Union Administration reports that 128.6 million Americans are member-owners of federally insured credit unions, which works out to about 38.6 percent of the nations population.

But the extent of cooperative business activity varies widely across regions and business sectors. Why have cooperatives been more successful in some areas than others? What are the most important ingredients for creating new co-ops? And how does the newest generation of co-ops differ from previous ones?

These were some of the questions that my colleagues at the University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives and I sought to address in a recent report titled Collective Action in Rural Communities. In that report, we identified 945 cooperatives that were formed between 2011 and 2019, including 195 in rural communities and 750 in urban areas.

The findings are intriguing, including rapid growth of worker cooperatives and the emergence of sector-specific development strategies. There has been considerable innovation in the field of food co-op development. Additionally, the use of cooperative land ownership has provided increased economic security for tens of thousands of families living in manufactured housing (mobile home) communities. The demographics of who creates co-ops has also shifted. Increasingly, co-ops are being used by people in communities of colorespecially Black, Indigenous, and Latinx communitiesas tools for community wealth building and economic development.

Before delving further into what is new, it is helpful to understand some of the waves of co-op development that have preceded our own. One of these waves involved the development of rural electric cooperatives, which today provide power to over 40 million Americans. Back in the 1930s, however, only one out of every ten rural households enjoyed the benefits of electricity, even as electric power was already nearly universally available in cities. Children did their schoolwork by the light of kerosene lamps at kitchen tables, household chores were accomplished by hand or horse, and food had to be preserved to last the entire year. In 1935, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt established the Rural Electrification Administration (REA), which provided loans and assistance to groups of farmers who wanted to build and own their own electrical distribution systems. The Rural Electrification Act of 1936 established a lending agency to finance this effort. Farmers, familiar with the cooperative model, quickly established rural electric cooperatives to take advantage of the program. The REA provided ongoing organizational support to these cooperatives, which contributed to the overall success of the program. By 1953, more than 90 percent of rural homes had access to electricity, which brought profound changes to rural life and agricultural practices.

The story of rural electrification exemplifies the power of cooperative actionwhat is possible when a group of people work collectively to meet a shared need. Many of the countrys largest and most prominent cooperative sectors have equally impressive origin stories rooted in a combination of social upheaval, government intervention, coordinated support, and personal gumption. Credit unions are another example of a successful systematic public and private intervention to create new opportunities for consumers to access credit. The concept of cooperative credit gained popularity during the 1920s, and a national association was formed to organize credit unions, promote state-level authorizing legislation, and eventually win passage of the Federal Credit Union Act in 1934 (Moody & Fite 1971). Today, as noted above, the nations 5,000-plus credit unions collectively have 128.6 million members.

Large numbers of farmer-owned grain and dairy cooperatives were organized and sustained with the support of social movement organizations like the Grange, in response to critical market failures. Beginning in the 1840s, farmers formed dairy cooperatives to process cheese and butter, and to market fluid milk in urban areas. By 1909, there were more than 2,700 dairy cooperatives. During the same period, farmers organized cooperatives to build thousands of elevators to store and market grain (Schneiberg et al. 2008). Today, dairy cooperatives handle approximately 85 percent of the total milk marketed in the United States, and in 2020, agricultural cooperatives as a whole employed over 185,000 workers, with revenues exceeding $200 billion.

Consumer cooperativessuch as credit unions, rural utilities, and mutual insurers (e.g., Nationwide)are by far the largest segment of cooperatives, with over 90 percent of US cooperatives identifying as consumer owned. Consumer co-ops remain a common form for cooperatives started between 2011 and 2019, but their share is declining, while the share of worker co-ops is rising. This can be seen over the course of the decade since we conducted two surveys. In the first survey, which covered the period from 2011-2016, 40 percent of newly incorporated cooperatives were consumer owned, which was more than any other single category. By contrast, in the second survey period of 2016-2019, worker co-ops were the single most common type of cooperative, constituting 47 percent of the new co-ops. That is an extraordinary figure, given that only one percent of US co-ops formed before 2010 are worker co-ops.

This trend, nonetheless, is not surprising, as it fits well with the historical pattern of development highlighted above. Cooperatives typically emerge when peoples needs are not being met by the marketand it would be hard to argue that late-stage capitalism is meeting the needs of most workers in America. From wage stagnation and the emergence of the gig economy to retiring business owners, employee ownership has been identified as a solution to many of our socioeconomic ills.

It is also important to note that the overall growth of worker cooperatives is not at all unrelated to the growing popularity of co-ops in Black communities, Indigenous communities, and communities of color. According to the 2015 State of the Sector report by the US Federation of Worker Cooperatives and the Democracy at Work Institute (DAWI), Two-thirds of worker cooperatives in 2015 were less than 15 years old and 39 percent were less than five years old. Almost 70 percent of all employees are female, about 60 percent are non-white and [Latinxs] are the largest plurality of any race (43 percent). And that trend has continuedaccording to the 2019 State of the Sector report, The racial demographics of worker owners continue to show a majority of people of color, with a concentration of Latinx workers. Of the 450-plus worker cooperatives in the US, approximately 38 percent of the membership is Latinx. And according to UWCCs 2020 study Latinx Co-op Power, approximately three-quarters of the Latinx cooperatives incorporated between 2014 and 2019 are worker-owned.

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

The jump in worker co-ops as a percentage of total cooperatives incorporated between our two survey periods was particularly notable in Colorado, a state better known for rural electric and farmer-owned cooperatives. While there are regions with much higher concentrations of worker cooperatives and more developed cooperative development ecosystems, the timing of Colorados growth in worker ownership is interesting in that it coincides with the states shift to an ecosystem approach to increasing employee ownership.

In 2012, the Rocky Mountain Employee Ownership Center (RMEOC) launched with the mission to build a more just and sustainable economy through employee ownership. RMEOC has taken a holistic, ecosystem approach to their cooperative development work. In addition to supporting cooperatives directly, they engage with policymakers, service providers, state leadership, and other stakeholders to strengthen the regions employee ownership ecosystem. The approach has paid off. There has been a recent flourishing of state level policy supporting cooperatives in Colorado including the creation of the Colorado Employee Ownership Commission and a Colorado Employee Ownership Office within the Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade. The Commission was charged with educating the public on the benefits of employee ownership, establishing a network of technical support for employee ownership conversions, and generating a list of recommendations for removing barriers to the development of employee-owned businesses. The Office supports these initiatives and channels grants, loan guarantees, and technical assistance to worker cooperatives.

Around the same time, Colorados legal environment became friendlier to cooperatives as the state strove to become known as the Delaware of Cooperatives. In 2011, the state adopted a new cooperative statute that allows outside investor-members within certain parameters and is flexible enough to be used by cooperatives in many sectors. And in 2014, a new law firm launched that serves and actively promotes cooperatives and other social enterprise models.

Colorado is one small example of what is possible through an ecosystem approach to cooperative developmentit is also exemplifies a broader national trend. The ecosystem of support for worker cooperatives exploded in the last decade. Two prominent national employee ownership organizations, DAWI and Project Equity, launched in 2013 and 2014, respectively; and in 2012 The Working World, which provides non-extractive financing and technical support to worker cooperatives, added a US-focused loan fund. Additionally, several longstanding cooperative development centers and community economic development organizations added or enhanced programming on worker ownership during this time. Private foundations and municipalities such as New York City; Madison, Wisconsin; Oakland, California; and Minneapolis, Minnesota, began investing in employee ownership to create good jobs and build community wealth. And investment capital is now starting to flowa 2020 study by the Democracy Collaborative identified a dozen new or emerging investment funds focused on supporting employee ownership transitions.

Another notable finding was the effectiveness of sector-specific strategies to scale specific segments of the cooperative economy. In the early 2000s, two national organizations emerged with sector-specific approaches in retail grocery and housing. These organizations served as national leaders that worked closely with local cooperative developers to spread their model, practices, and expertise on the local level. Were now seeing the fruit of their labor.

Food Co-op Initiative (FCI) started in 2005 as Food Cooperative 500, a pilot project launched by leaders from the grocery cooperative community who wanted to test the theory that new food retail cooperatives could open more quickly and successfully if they had appropriate guidance. FCI connects food co-op organizers across the country with a suite of industry-specific resources including organizing tools and best practices, training and technical advice, peer learning opportunities, and seed capital. Since its founding, 157 new retail food cooperatives have opened in the US and nearly 100 additional communities are currently working to open new stores.

ROC USAthe ROC stands for resident-owned communitiesis another example of an organization that has successfully developed cooperatives in a specific sector: manufactured (mobile) home communities. Launched in 2008, ROC USA works in partnership with a formal network of nonprofit affiliates and has a national technical assistance team.It also provides financing through ROC USA Capital, a community development financial institution (CDFI).The technical assistance and financingalong with third-party legal counsel and engineersfacilitate the conversion of manufactured home communities to cooperative ownership. ROC USA is headquartered in New Hampshire where the model was pioneered and market-tested for more than two decades before expanding nationally.In New Hampshire and Vermont alone, approximately 39 new housing cooperatives were formed in the past decade. Today,the network represents nearly 300 co-ops and 20,000 member-owners in 21 states; in the past three years, the network has developed 20 new co-ops a year.

Cooperatives are not a panacea, but they are a time-tested strategy for improving social and economic wellbeing. Cooperatives have the potential to build community wealth, empower workers, and help small businesses thrive in an increasingly competitive world. While cooperative businesses can be challenging to launch, they are a solid long-term investment. Studies from the across the globe have shown that once established, cooperatives last longer than other forms of business and are more resilient during times of crisis. Many of the cooperatives established during earlier waves of cooperative development are still serving their members decades lateras of 2020, 76.5 percent of all agricultural cooperative were more than 50 years old, and 17.5 percent were more than 100 years of age.

As Andrew Crosson explained in a recent NPQ article on Appalachia, an ecosystem approach is required to overcome barriers to shared prosperity and to create an economy that works for all. The same argument applies to the development of strong, networked cooperatives that meet the needs of individuals and communities. Historical examples, as well as the cooperative development success stories of today, demonstrate the power of taking an ecosystem approach to building a resilient cooperative economy. Co-op development trends reflect social and economic trends; they also reflect trends in philanthropy and public investment. This begs two questions: What collective needs must we most urgently address? And what investments can we make today that will usher in the next wave of cooperative development?

See the rest here:
Where Are New Co-ops Emerging? The Changing Map of Co-op Development - Non Profit News - Nonprofit Quarterly

Sixteen of the top 20 metro areas posted gains during the year

HAMILTON, New Jersey January 25, 2022 The value of commercial and multifamily construction starts in the top 20 metropolitan areas of the U.S. increased 18% from 2020 to 2021, according to Dodge Construction Network. Nationally, commercial and multifamily construction starts increased 16% in 2021. In the leading half (the top 10 metro areas), commercial and multifamily starts rose 18% in 2021, with two metro areas, Washington, DC, and Los Angeles, CA, posting a decline. In the lesser half of metro areas (those ranked 11 through 20), commercial and multifamily starts rose 17% in 2021, with Chicago, IL, and Nashville, TN, losing ground from 2020.

Commercial and multifamily construction starts staged a solid recovery in 2021 following stalled projects and growing uncertainties that plagued the industry in 2020. It bears noting, however, that commercial and multifamily construction starts remain below 2019 levels, highlighting that the sector has yet to fully recover from the impact of the pandemic. In fact, larger metro areas have struggled to gain momentum as demand for construction shifts away from denser urban areas.

In the top 20 metro areas of 2021, commercial and multifamily starts were 5% below the level recorded in 2019, and national commercial and multifamily starts were 2% below the 2019 level. In the top 10 metro areas, commercial and multifamily starts were 9% below their 2019 levels, while starts in the metro areas ranked 11-20 were up 5% from 2019. This reveals that in 2021, smaller, less dense metropolitan areas are becoming increasingly popular.

The New York metropolitan area was the top market for commercial and multifamily starts in 2021 at $26.8 billion, an increase of 14% from 2020. The Dallas, TX, metropolitan area was in second place, totaling $10.7 billion for the year, an impressive 45% gain over 2020. The Miami, FL, metro area was ranked third in 2021, with commercial and multifamily starts totaling $8.4 billion, a dramatic 65% increase over 2020.

The remaining top 10 metropolitan areas through the first half of 2021 were:

In summary, the top 10 metropolitan areas accounted for 39% of all commercial and multifamily starts in the United States, unchanged from their 2020 share.

The second-largest metro group included:

This secondary group of metro areas accounted for 18% of all commercial and multifamily starts in the United States in 2021, unchanged in share from the previous year.

The commercial and multifamily total is comprised of office buildings, stores, hotels, warehouses, commercial garages and multifamily housing. Not included in this ranking are institutional projects (e.g., educational facilities, hospitals, convention centers, casinos, transportation terminals), manufacturing buildings, single family housing, public works and electric utilities/gas plants.

In 2021, total U.S. commercial and multifamily building starts rose 16% to $236.6 billion from 2020. Nationally, commercial starts were up 8% to $120.3 billion, while multifamily starts were 25% higher at $116.4 billion. Within the top 10 metro areas, commercial building starts rose 11% to $45.1 billion in 2021, while multifamily starts gained 25% to $48.0 billion. Within the second largest group of metropolitan areas, commercial building starts declined 4% in 2021, while multifamily starts improved 42% from 2020.

Commercial and multifamily construction starts staged a strong rebound in 2021, despite the continued impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, stated Richard Branch, Chief Economist for Dodge Construction Network. This recovery, however, has been fairly uneven with the focus on warehouse and multifamily activity, while office and hotel construction remain more constrained by the pandemic. Looking ahead, 2022 should bring with it a more even recovery spread across most commercial project types, while multifamily will continue to benefit from the high cost of single-family homes. While positivity abounds for the year ahead, be aware that high material prices and a shortage of skilled labor will prove to be limiting factors and will restrain overall growth.

In the New York, NY, metropolitan area, commercial and multifamily construction starts rose 14% in 2021 to $26.8 billion. Despite this strong gain, the level of activity is 13% below the level of construction starts in 2019. Multifamily starts were up 20% in 2021. The largest multifamily projects to break ground in 2021 were the $500 million 625 Fulton Street mixed-use project, the $349 million first phase of the Bronx Point mixed-use project, and the $300 million Islablue Apartments and Condominiums. In 2021, commercial starts rose 8%, led by gains in warehouses, retail, and parking while offices and hotels posted declines. The largest commercial projects to get underway in 2021 were the $1.5 billion JPMorgan Chase office tower, the $1.2 billion Terminal Warehouse conversion and a $380 million Bronx Logistics Center.

Commercial and multifamily starts in the Dallas, TX, metro area were up 45% in 2021 to $10.7 billion and surpassing the mark set during 2019, prior to the onset of the pandemic. Commercial starts rose 41% during the year with only the retail sector losing ground. The largest commercial projects started in 2021 were the $550 million second phase of the Lowes Hotel and Convention Center, the $175 million Granite Park Six office tower and the $150 million Hardwood No. 14 office tower. Multifamily starts were 52% higher in 2021. The largest multifamily projects to get underway in 2021 were the $250 million Maple Terrace residential building, the $120 million Hall Park D4 residential tower and the $100 million Urby residential tower.

In the Miami, FL, metropolitan area, commercial and multifamily construction starts rose 65% in 2021 to $8.4 billion. The dollar value of multifamily starts more than doubled in 2021, rising 104%. The largest multifamily projects to break ground in 2021 were the $1 billion 1 Southside Park mixed-use building, the $250 million Five Park condominiums and apartments and the $206 million first phase of the Miami River mixed-use project. Commercial starts were 21% higher in 2021, led by gains in parking structures, hotels and retail. Office and warehouse starts were both lower in 2021. The largest commercial buildings to get started in 2021 were the $340 million Legacy Hotel, the $122 million second phase of the Bridge Point Commerce Center warehouse project and the $75 million Boca Raton resort.

Washington, D.C.s commercial and multifamily building starts fell 9% in 2021 to $8.4 billion, and they remain 29% below the mark set in 2019. Commercial starts in Washington, D.C., lost 18% due to pullbacks in office, retail and warehouse starts. Starts for parking structures and hotels, however, both posted a gain in 2021. The largest commercial projects to break ground in 2021 were the $450 million Sterling 144 MW EdgeCore data center, the $225 million Vantage data center and the $200 million 20 Massachusetts Ave. renovation project. Multifamily building starts rose 1% in 2021. The largest multifamily project to get underway in 2021 was the $267 million 1900 Crystal/1851 S. Bell South & North residences, the $230 million Mather Senior Living Community and the $174 million 4000 Wisconsin Ave. NW/Upton Place mixed-use project.

Commercial and multifamily starts in the Boston, MA, metropolitan area rose 16% in 2021 to $7.3 billion. Despite the strong gain, starts were still 12% shy of their pre-pandemic high in 2019. Multifamily starts were particularly robust during the year, increasing 29%. The largest multifamily projects to break ground in 2021 were the $200 million 60 Kilmarnock St. residential building, the $200 million DOT Block Residences and the $165 million Union Square/USQ residential tower. Commercial starts rose 5% in 2021, led by increases in warehouse and parking structure starts, while office, hotel, and retail starts each fell. The largest commercial projects to break ground in 2021 were the $466 million North Andover Amazon distribution center, the $350 million Amazon Seaport Square office tower and the $225 million 171 Dartmouth St. office building.

Los Angeles, CA, commercial and multifamily starts were down 12% in 2021 to $7.1 billion and were down 24% from the pre-pandemic peak in 2019. Commercial starts in Los Angeles were down 32% over the year entirely due to the office and hotel sectors, which saw several large projects break ground in early 2020. Meanwhile, retail and warehouse starts increased. The largest commercial projects to get underway in 2021 were the $200 million Spectrum Terrace office campus, the $102 million OCSD headquarter project and the $100 million Ovation Hollywood mixed-use building. Multifamily starts improved 6% in 2021. The largest multifamily projects to break ground were the $250 million 520 S. Mateo Arts District mixed-use, the $215 million Broad Block mixed-use building and the $125 million The Line at Burbank apartments.

In Atlanta, GA, commercial and multifamily starts were up 49% to $6.6 billion in 2021. Despite the gain, commercial and multifamily starts were still 9% below the level of starts in 2019. Multifamily starts rose 46% in 2021 thanks to large projects such as the $400 million 1018 West Peachtree apartments, the $300 million first phase of the High Street Atlanta mixed-use development and the $175 million Hanover apartments. Commercial starts gained 52% in 2021, with all categories except for parking structures gaining ground over the year. The largest commercial projects to get underway in 2021 were the $271 million Signia Hilton Hotel at Georgia World Congress Center, the $202 million CDC Chamblee campus buildings and the $100 million The Cubes at River Park warehouse building.

Seattle, WA, commercial and multifamily construction starts were 48% higher in 2021 at $6.2 billion and were 18% higher than in 2019. Commercial starts were up 44% in the office, warehouse and retail sectors, while hotel and parking posted declines. The largest commercial projects to get underway in 2021 were the $355 million Project Roxy distribution center, the $325 million Amazon Bellevue 600 Tower One and the $270 million The Eight office building. Multifamily starts rose 51% in 2021 with the $150 million Google Campus development, the $131 million First Light mixed-use project and the $113 million SkyGlass Tower apartments among the largest multifamily projects to break ground.

In Phoenix, AZ, commercial and multifamily starts were up 11% to $6 billion in 2021, up 48% from the pre-pandemic high set in 2019. Multifamily starts, however, fell 8% in 2021. The largest multifamily projects to get underway in 2021 were the $170 million Culdesac Tempe apartment building, the $91 million first phase of the Milhaus North apartments and the $87 million Skye on 6th apartments. Commercial starts moved 27% higher in 2021 due to increases in warehouse, retail and office starts, while hotel and parking structure starts fell. The largest commercial projects to break ground in 2021 were the $800 million first phase of the Facebook Eastmark Parkway data center campus, the $100 million first phase of The Cubes at Glendale warehouse project and the $75 million NTT data center.

Commercial and multifamily building starts in Houston, TX, rose 5% in 2021 to $5.5 billion but were 37% lower than the level of activity before the pandemic in 2019. Commercial starts increased 4% in 2021 due to gains in warehouse, hotel and retail starts, while office and parking structures declined. The largest commercial projects to get underway in 2021 were the $135 million second phase of the Empire West Business Park, the $125 million 1550 on The Green office building and the $70 million TGS Cedar Port warehouse. In 2021 multifamily starts rose 6% with the largest multifamily projects to get underway including the $89 million The Hawthorne condo tower, the $61 million West Dallas apartment building and the $60 million Oleanders at Broadway residential building.

Here is the original post:
Commercial and Multifamily Construction Starts Post Solid Recovery in 2021 - Construction.com

Construction has begun on the next phase of a high-end apartment complex at the late philanthropist Robert L.B. Tobins former Northeast Side estate.

Dallas developer Rosewood Property Co. last year completed 286 units, a pool and a clubhouse at 3310 Oakwell Court. Now its building another 311 units, seven townhomes and a 4,500-square-foot fitness center at the complex, dubbed The Tobin Estates Apartments.

Work is expected to wrap up in fall of 2023 and a third and final phase with around 355 units will begin after that, a spokesperson said.

With the outstanding success of our initial phase at Tobin Estates, phase two is designed to build upon that success by diversifying living options and finishes, Rick Perdue, president of Rosewood Property, said in a statement. By adding even more amenities to the existing ones, phase two will offer an extension to the existing outdoor oasis. We are excited to grow this great community in north San Antonio.

Rents for one-bedroom units generally start at $1,500, two-bedrooms at $1,800 and three-bedrooms at $2,450, the spokesperson said. The Tobin Estates are over 96 percent occupied.

On ExpressNews.com: Dallas developer finishes first phase of apartments at former Tobin estate

Tobins mansion on the property houses the Tobin Endowments offices.

Rosewood Property Co. recently started construction on the second phase of The Tobin Estates Apartments, as shown in renderings.

Tobin, heir to an aerial mapping company founded by his father, was a patron of arts and cultural institutions and a collector of paintings, designs for opera and ballet productions and other works.

His original estate included 500 acres. In the 1980s, he developed Oakwell Farms, a master-planned community with upscale homes, multifamily dwellings and office buildings.

Plans to sell and develop most of what was left of the estate in 2015 were opposed by many Oakwell Farms residents.

The Tobin Endowment had proposed working with developer David Weekley to build more than 400 detached townhomes but residents argued it would be too dense. Citing concerns about drainage and traffic problems, they also pushed back against a plan for 956 apartments but said they would support the complex if it reflected the neighborhoods character.

J. Bruce Bugg Jr., chairman and trustee of the Tobin Endowment, said developing the land would generate more property tax revenue and was in line with Tobins vision. The property was tax-exempt and selling it would generate more money for charity, he said.

Seventy-four people spoke against the apartments at a Planning Commission meeting in 2015. After three hours, commissioners gave the go-ahead to the development on a 7-1 vote.

On ExpressNews.com: Tobin Estate apartments approved despite protests from Oakwell Farms residents

The Tobin Endowment sold about 44 acres in 2016 for an undisclosed price to Rosewood, a subsidiary of The Rosewood Corp. that has also built two apartment complexes near the intersection of Interstate 10 and Loop 1604.

Some Oakwell Farms residents remain worried about traffic congestion worsening and flooding due to debris back-up, residents Beverly Alcott and Barbara Lowry said in February interviews.

Multifamily development is surging in the San Antonio area. There were 16,657 units under construction locally as of the third quarter, with work on more than 10,000 more expected to begin in the next year, according to a report by ApartmentTrends.com.

Investors are also buying existing complexes and vacant land, according to the report.

Average occupancy at local apartments was 95 percent for the three months ended in September. Average rent per month was $1,169, up from $1,008 in the third quarter of 2020 and from $1,018 in the third quarter of 2019, prior to the coronavirus pandemic.

Sales and construction are off the charts as everyone tries to get in on the action, the reports authors wrote. The current climate is reminiscent of the apartment boom that hit Austin in the 1990s, yet San Antonio has eased into this boom, as a steady city does.

madison.iszler@express-news.net

Read the original here:
More high-end apartments on the way at Tobin estate as second phase of construction starts - San Antonio Express-News

Construction of an $11 million apartment project at 520 88th St. in West Des Moinesis expected to be completed by fall.Rendering courtesy of TWG

Construction is underway in West Des Moines on an $11 million, 49-unit apartment development whose targeted residents qualify for affordable rental rates.In the past few years, theres been an underinvestment in affordable housing in the Des Moines area, and specifically in West Des Moines, said Graham Parr, development analyst at TWG, the Indianapolis-based real estate development company developing Pointe on 88th at 520 88th St.Demand for affordable housing has increased during the pandemic, Parr said. This project will help satisfy that additional demand.The three-story apartment building will include one- to three-bedroom units, 44 of which will be reserved for people earning between 30% and 60% of the area median income, or between $24,700 and $49,302 annually for a family of three. Rental rates for a family of three will range from $618 to $1,233 per month.Five of the buildings units will be leased at market rates.Amenities in the building will include a community room and fitness center.The Pointe on 88th is TWGs 12th project in Iowa. The company recently completed construction of theLillis Lofts,a $10 million affordable housing project in Urbandale. Other Iowa projects include Annex on the Square, a new $49 million mixed-income multifamily property that will cover a city block in downtown Cedar Rapids and Federal Point, a $39 million workforce housing property in Davenport.TWG also developed the 213-unit apartment building at 201 S.E. Sixth St. in Des Moines East Village neighborhood. TWG sold the buildingin October.Construction of the West Des Moines apartment is expected to be completed by fall 2022.

Read more:
49-unit WDM affordable apartment project expected to be completed by fall - Business Record

In June 2019, Willow Valley Communities announced plans to partner with Lancaster Equity on a renovation of Southern Market. At the same time it said it would build a multi-story mixed use complex across the street. In December 2020, Willow Valley said the latter project at the former LNP production building at the northwest corner of South Queen and West Vine streets would be a $90 million 147-apartment 20-story high rise the tallest building in the city called Mosaic.

After getting several key approvals, the final plan for Mosaic is still subject to review by the city planning commission, which John Swanson, CEO of Willow Valley Development Corp., said could come in the next several months. Although Willow Valley could soon have the final go-ahead, the earliest construction might start is late this year since Swanson said Willow Valley first wants to get commitments on at least 70% of its units.

Our process is to sell and then build, not build and then try to sell, Swanson said.

In its marketing materials for Mosaic, Willow Valley plays up its proximity to Southern Market. On the Willow Valley website, Southern Market features prominently in the foreground of a rendering of Mosaic. And a description of life at Mosaic begins, Travel the culinary globe, just across the street from the revitalized Southern Market food hall.

Success! An email has been sent with a link to confirm list signup.

Error! There was an error processing your request.

See the article here:
Construction of Willow Valley Communities' 20-story downtown building to begin after sales of its apartments - LNP | LancasterOnline

Over the past decade, many cities around the world have experienced a significant rise in housing costs, and the large cities of New Zealand are no exception. The small nations median house price rose by approximately 130% between 2011 and 2021, far outpacing household income growth and eroding housing affordability.

Undersupply has contributed to these rising housing costs. Census data reveals that New Zealands population increased by 10.8% between 2013 and 2018, but the stock of occupied dwellings only increased by 6.6% over the same periodindicating that there are chronic shortages of housing in the locations where people want to live.

In response, the New Zealand government recently passed sweeping zoning reform legislation to permit medium-density housing in all of the countrys major cities. This policy builds on the earlier success of upzoning in the countrys largest city, Auckland, to redress housing shortages by encouraging higher-density housing. The reform is also part of a broader policy shift to encourage housing construction by allowing cities to build up.

In October 2021, New Zealands center-left Labour government announced the zoning reform to stimulate housing construction through redevelopment. The so-called Medium Density Residential Standard will require the countrys most populous cities to permit up to three stories and three dwellings on all existing residential parcels of land. The policy would allow a parcel with a detached single-family dwelling to be redeveloped into row houses or a small apartment block.

The reforms represent a significant reversal in the nations approach to urban planning and development. Since the 1980s, New Zealand has adopted land use policies that encouraged low-density housing in residential areas, entrenching detached single-family housing in its suburbs. Consequently, construction of high-rise apartment buildings has been limited to central business districts and areas zoned for commercial use. Construction of medium-density housing, such as the rowhouses that are commonly found in the cities on the East Coast of the United States, has been missing from the mix.

Although local governments are responsible for the design and implementation of zoning regulations, the prevalence of low-density housing was underpinned by national-level legislation governing land use. The 1991 Resource Management Act restricted urban development and has been repeatedly criticized for insufficient recognition of housing and infrastructure in its purpose and guiding principles. The act not only presented an impediment to building vertically, but it also hampered the ability of cities to grow horizontally. A long series of official inquiries has identified its shortcomings.

The Resource Management Act restrained housing supply and attendant infrastructure during a period of significant population growth. Between 1991 and 2018, New Zealands population grew by approximately two-thirds. Over the same period, the social impacts of increasing housing costs have become more acute. Housing costs for low-income New Zealanders have doubled as a proportion of their income since the 1980s, and homeownership rates have fallen while household debt has increased substantially.

Over the past decade, both center-left and center-right governments have deployed policies intended to rein in runaway house prices. These include both demand- and supply-side policies, such as a capital gains tax targeted at housing speculation, a ban on foreign investment in residential housing, fast-tracked inclusive housing developments, and state-subsidized housing development projects.

The effect of monetary and macro-prudential policy on house prices has also increasingly been put under the spotlight. Upon the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the countrys central bank dropped interest rates to all-time lows and removed macro-prudential restrictions on mortgage credit, fueling a further 20% to 40% increase in house prices in different regions across the country. The government reacted by pushing for the central bank to consider house prices when setting interest rates, raising concerns that the long-held independence of the central bank was being undermined.

Typically, a political partys housing policies are criticized by the opposing party. However, the original announcement of the Medium Density Residential Standard in October was notable for being bipartisan. The minister for housing, Dr. Megan Woods, shared the podium with members of the opposition National Party when making the announcement, who made their own statements voicing their support. The bill was subsequently passed in December with bipartisan support.

Bipartisanship lends the zoning reform credibility. Policies to promote redevelopment and densification are often unpopular with local residents, which raises the possibility that the policy will be overturned after the next election. But the opposition partys public support for the bill indicates that the law will remain in place even if it wins the next election in 2023. A bipartisan commitment removes political uncertainty and encourages developers and homebuyers to incorporate the policy changes into their decision making.

This is not the first time New Zealand has turned to zoning reforms to encourage housing construction. In 2016, the nations largest city, Auckland, upzoned approximately three-quarters of its residential land area under the Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP). Auckland houses about a third of the nations 5 million people, and is also the countrys commercial capital, accounting for 38% of the gross domestic product.

Although motivated by a variety of factors, the undersupply of housing and erosion of housing affordability were the prominent justifications for the zoning reforms introduced under the AUP. The municipal government for the entire metropolitan area, the Auckland Council, estimated that the plan tripled the dwelling capacity of the city.

My work with Peter Phillips shows that the AUP has enabled a construction boom. New housing units permitted have increased every year since the policy was enacted, with all of these increases occurring in the citys upzoned areas.

Immediately prior to the plan, new housing units permitted peaked at about 6,000 in 2015. By 2020, that figure had climbed to over 14,300.

The policy also shifted residential construction into attached multifamily housing. Immediately prior to the plan, new dwelling permits for attached housing peaked at 1,300 in 2015; by 2020, that figure had climbed to 8,100. This means that most of the 14,300 new dwelling permits issued in 2020 were for attached housing. The policy also stimulated an increase in detached housing, but the increase is not nearly as great. Prior to the policy, detached permits peaked at about 4,700 in 2015; by 2019, that figure had risen to just under 6,200.

Upzoning also encouraged a more compact city by stimulating construction in Aucklands inner suburban areas, which span a radius of approximately 20 to 25 kilometers from the central business district. In 2015, about two in three housing permits issued were in the inner suburbs. By 2020, six out of every seven permits issued were for construction of a home in the inner suburbs.

The success of upzoning in Auckland provided the blueprint for more recent national zoning reforms, with the business case for the policy change based on construction activity and outcomes in the citys medium-density zones.

The Medium Density Residential Standard comes on the heels of another national policy directive to encourage housing densification along public transit corridors. In 2020, the Labour government issued the National Policy Statement on Urban Development, which requires large cities to zone for residential structures of up to six stories within walking distance of rapid transit stations (approximately 800 meters, at the minimum recommendation).

In addition to redressing the housing shortages that have accumulated over the past three decades, transit-oriented housing development is intended to lower energy consumption through shorter commutes and increased patronage of public transit, assisting the country to meet its carbon neutrality goals.

New Zealands three zoning reform policies enacted over the past five yearsthe Auckland Unitary Plan, the National Policy Statement on Urban Development, and the Medium Density Residential Standardadd up to a shift to encourage more housing construction through a more compact form of urban development.

The results from Auckland to date indicate that these reforms can enable housing construction and redevelopment. This is important, as rezoning reforms do not always achieve their anticipated goals. Understanding and identifying the catalysts that enabled construction in Auckland can help policymakers in the design and implementation of zoning reforms in the future.

What remains to be seen is the extent to which zoning reforms can enhance affordability. If the increase in housing supply in Auckland and other cities can bring down house prices in the years to come, New Zealands reforms can be a model for other countries struggling with housing affordability to follow.

View original post here:
New Zealands bipartisan housing reforms offer a model to other countries - Brookings Institution

HDC Hyundai Development raided in connection with Gwangju apartment building collapse

Rescuers comb through debris last Thursday, looking for workers who went missing in a deadly apartment construction accident in the southern city of Gwangju. (Yonhap)

Officials from the Ministry of Employment and Labor and the National Police Agency conducted a joint raid of the real estate developer's headquarters in central Seoul to search for evidence in connection with the accident that occurred on Jan. 11.

Search operations have continued for a week after the facade on a 39-story apartment building under construction crumbled to the ground in Gwangju, about 330 kilometers southwest of Seoul.

Five construction workers remain unaccounted for, with one worker found dead under the rubble Friday.

On Monday, Chung Mong-gyu, chairman of HDC Hyundai Development, offered to step down to take responsibility for the accident. Chung said he will consider terminating the contracts for the buyers, and completely demolishing and reconstructing the apartment buildings from the start if the safety inspection finds there was a problem. (Yonhap)

Go here to read the rest:
HDC Hyundai Development raided in connection with Gwangju apartment building collapse - The Korea Herald

(Update: Adding video, comment from city officials)

BEND, Ore. (KTVZ) -- With developable land in short supply in Bend, more and more multifamily housing are being built in the city.

The citys chief operations officer, Russell Grayson, said Monday some policy changes were made over the past few years to help make the big shift happen.

Now, the city is seeing more multifamily housing then it ever thought they were going to see.

Bend Chief Operations Officer Russell Grayson told NewsChannel 21 on Monday there were 650 units in construction right now.

Thats compared to just 62 units completed in the past six months. The city has determined a reason for the shift in building habits.

"With single-family housing units, houses becoming so expensive in town, we realized we need different types of housing units on the ground, Grayson said.

He said the goal was to make it closer to a 60-40 split between multifamily and single-family construction.

Were seeing a lot more apartment-type buildings, but weve also had some recent policy changes and code changes to allow more duplexes, triplexes andfourplexes, tied to a change in state law that requires allowing multifamily housing in formerly exclusive single-family zoning, Grayson said.

Lynne McConnell, the citys housing director, said the policy changes are partially a result of state pressure.

We have to look at how todensifywithin city limits before we can look at expanding our urban growth boundary, McConnell said.

And the other reason is the citys growth

"Our growth is pretty exceptional, McConnell said.

And if Bend keeps growing like it is now, you might expect to see more apartments,townhomesand duplexes coming to a block near you.

Read the rest here:
Bend's big shift from single-family homes to more multifamily housing tops city's expectations - KTVZ

New Construction Is Not Always the Answer

Facebook

Twitter

Pinterest

Whatsapp

Mail

Or

This article was originally published on Common Edge.

California, as with most American states, has a housing crisis.Unlike the rest of the country, it is actually working to ameliorate the situation, with private and public initiatives that critics cant help but label inadequate. The Bay Area made accessory dwelling units legal by changing zoning laws, but that has hardly made a dent. Some cities are now pushing for additional upzoning to give developers more room to bring new buildings to market at lower rents. There are all sorts of studies, university sponsored or underwritten by the industry, that recommend more-or-less radical fixes for a seemingly unfixable problem. Environmentalists are naturally cast as villains because they dont condone greenfield developments. And Californians are tough on their elected officials, as the current governor learned last year.

Amidst the fracas, UCLA planner M. Nolan Gray offered a recent essay in The Atlantic that settles the issue of whether or not to bring adaptive reuse to bear on the Wests biggest challengeapart from global warming, earthquakes, forest fires, mudslides, floods, and the rest of the regions plagues. As he writes: In housing circles, one hears a lot of self-righteous discussion about the need for more preservation. And many American homes doubtless deserve to stick around. But the truth is that we fetishize old homes. Whatever your aesthetic preferences, new construction is better on nearly every conceivable measure, and if we want to ensure universal access to decent housing, we should be building a lot more of it.

So, for Westerners who live in makeshift bungalows, trailer parks, trashy 50s dingbats, and the odd crumbling concrete high-rise, it pays to build new and forget the Victorian painted ladies that made San Francisco a gay haven in the 70s. San Francisco, the author argues, has more decrepit old houses than New Orleans or Charleston, South Carolina, because city fathers caved into historic preservationists back then, while they were also going easy on homeless junkies. Though I doubt he knows much about these two cities and their historic place in pioneering zoning and preservation law in the U.S., Mr. Gray feels sure that they got rid of extraneous housing stock without the nostalgia he sees affecting things in Los Angeles and San Francisco, where they fetishize old homes. New construction is better on nearly every conceivable measure than reusing old buildings, whatever their age and condition.

As one who has spent his career restoring and adding to historic houses, as well as researching domestic architecture, and who co-authored a book with Gordon Bock on the subject, I beg to differ. I am also surprised that The Atlantic published such a short essay on this complex and important subject. If one is going to argue so vehemently, one ought to do so in detail and have the facts straight; but Gray sees everything in black and white and uses facts sparingly.

When discussing the 20th century, one should also be aware that preWorld War II construction, despite its asbestos and lead paint, was among the most durable and well-engineered the world has seen.

It first pays to distinguish between the Eastern Seaboard and Southwestwhere European colonists began building in the 16th century and left a considerable footprint on todays cities and townsand the Far West and Midwest, where building stock is younger by a century or more. When discussing the 20th century, one should also be aware that preWorld War II construction, despite its asbestos and lead paint, was among the most durable and well-engineered the world has seenthis according to many experts, including Henry Petroski of Duke University.

Fire safety is a red herring here. Developer McMansions from the past four decades are riddled with toxic substances, including flammable vinyl siding, and are apt to fall apart within a few decades due to poor construction. Though house fires can level a balloon-frame dwelling in minutes, very few were actually constructed in the U.S. before platform framing became the norm. Prewar apartment buildings in New York City have the highest value among all housing types and are the safest buildings once a few upgrades are made to sprinklers and building systems. The residents of Londons 1967 Grenfell Tower hardly felt safe when a fire began on the fourth floor in 2017 and spread up the exterior of the building, consuming a 2012 upgrade to the facade cladding. Unlike prewar buildings, it had only one central fire stair, since the brutalist structure was thought unlikely to need a second. So much of Californias housing stock is postWorld War II that it does not make sense to claim it will resist fires or perform better thermally than East Coast buildings from before that time. Chicago, which endured the most destructive American fire prior to San Franciscos, has an excellent fabric of brick, steel-frame, concrete, and wood-frame buildings that have never presented a major hazard. Miami Beach, on the other hand, allowed developers to build with nary a code restriction, resulting in apartment buildings that are now at risk of falling down due to poor design and aging, ill-maintained structures. (It looks as though San Franciscos high-tech Salesforce Tower may go that way in a few years time.)

When costs are figured, it is essential to look not only at first costs in construction, as well as energy consumed, but also embodied energy and lifecycle cost projections. True, today it is still more expensive to renovate most historic buildings (especially smaller ones) than to build new, but only when ignoring data about the buildings original materials and its performance over a long period. Building anew creates more waste than any other human endeavor, so reusing any existing construction will reduce this contribution to landfills. It is also easier to design ADA accommodations, elevators, and super-insulating walls into new buildings. Better design standards, even in newer LEED documents, are making it easier to bring these improvements into old buildings. As government begins to address the infrastructure crisis, the market will soon reflect lower costs in renovation and reuse.

Sound attenuation is certainly a factor when people live in high-rises, or close to neighbors in a dense neighborhood. But city life is inherently noisy, and one can move to less-crowded environs if commuting is not an issue (which it usually is in California). Much prewar construction, with plaster partition walls, performs almost as well as highly-insulated gypsum board wall assemblies. Moreover, only luxury buildings commonly feature such sound insulation in all party walls, so one is not likely to find peace and quiet without shelling out extra cash.

Are new apartment buildings generally more pleasant, comfortable, and beautiful than old ones? Again, we can look at different regions and find varied opinions. In new towns out West, where there are fewer historic neighborhoods, it is likely the natives are used to well-landscaped and amenity-rich condominium complexes or gated communities that were built within the last few decades. Each entry into the market comes with extravagant claims, many now coded with green terminology, that will draw the most discerning buyers. As many who readCommon Edgewill know, cutting-edge design doesnt always please the best-educated citizens of our divided nation.

In places with rich history and varied ethnic populations, there is substantial research suggesting that traditional urbanism and architecture attract high-income buyers and please virtually all homeowners, while new construction almost always falls short. The Congress for the New Urbanism publishes such research regularly, and several West Coast planners such as Peter Calthorpe, Stefanos Polyzoides, and Elizabeth Moule have designed successful communities based on CNU studies. In most cases, the new neighborhoods are inspired directly by old ones. Charlestons Battery and Queenss Forest Hills Gardens are still coveted places in which to raise a family, retire, or simply live the good life. Historic districts in Santa Barbara, Santa Fe, and Leadville are beloved places beyond the borders of California, New Mexico, and Colorado. Where would these states be without tourism?

Is it responsible to argue that by every reasonable measure new construction beats old construction? Apparently, Mr. Gray did not useevery conceivablemeasure when making his case, so I cant say I am convinced he is correct. I hope that critical readers ofThe Atlanticwill make their own judgments based on wider evidence than he presented.

This does not mean that the U.S. wont need 700,000 units of housing every year to fill its huge housing gap over a 10-year period. It simply means that those in the building, planning, and design professions should look to all appropriate solutions when addressing the crisis. In many areas new construction will be the only logical alternative, but when choosing dwellings, one size has never fit all inhabitants. In most urban areas there are redundant office buildings, warehouses, churches, and schools that citizens want to save if new uses can be found for them. With tax credits like those in the 1983 federal legislation prior to its Reagan-era amendments, and a robust infrastructure spending program, these buildings will be attractive for developers. Builders will make money on reuse and wont need to build new housing in neighborhoods that people love to live in. It makes no sense to argue for urban renewaldestruction of old fabric for the sake of redevelopmentwhen so many excellent buildings stand empty in virtually every American city (yes, Mr. Gray, even Los Angeles).

If a building is clearly old, deteriorated beyond repair, and of little aesthetic merit, remove it. But dont do the typical American thing and condemn it simply because it isnt bright and shiny and new. There are adobes in New Mexico that have stood for four centuries, and which still provide comfortable and attractive accommodations, though the plumbing has been replaced a few times over the years. In a dry, mountain climate, these buildings outperform the best Net Zero houses, and they are planted like cacti in specific locales. People identify with them, treasure them, and take care to see that they remain in good use and repair. As Stewart Brand reminds us, most old buildings learn and adapt to changing circumstancesnothing good will come of destroying them.

See the original post here:
New Construction Is Not Always the Answer - ArchDaily