Wonkblog: The slow death of the home-cooked meal

Cooking isn't dead in this country. But it isn't exactly alive and well either.

"How is it that we are so eager to watch other people browning beef cubes on screen but so much less eager to brown them ourselves?," Michael Pollan asked, in a scathing 2009 New York Times piece about the great irony of America's supposed interest in cooking.

Indeed, by virtually any measure one might imagine,Americans areleaving their stoves, ovens, countertops, and cutting boards behind or, at least, untouched a lot more often. Thepurest example of this trend is playing out in the types of dinners people are eating at home today. Less than 60 percent of suppers served at home were actually cooked at home last year. Only 30years ago, the percentagewas closer to 75 percent.

The fallout stalled a bitduring the recession, when cash-strapped families had to backtrack a bit and spend some time over the stove to save money. But it has since resumed its downward trend, and there's little reason to believe its trajectory will change, according to Harry Balzer, an analyst at market research firm NPD Group, whichhas been followingthe eating habits of Americans for for almost three decadesas part of a series called "Eating Patterns in America," which tracks what, when, and how more than 2,000 households eat.

"This is one of those downward trends to watch," said Balzer."At the current rate, less than half of all dinners eaten at home in this country will be homemade."

That slow but steady disappearance of cooking in the United States is happening on other levels, too. A comprehensive study published in 2013 showed that all Americans, no matter their socioeconomic status, are cooking less than they have in the past.

Between the mid 1960s and late 2000s, low income households went from eating at home 95 percent of the time to only 72 percent of the time, middle income households when from eating at home 92 percent of the time to 69 percent of the time, and high income households went from eating at home 88 percent of the time to only 65 percent of the time.

Men and women, collectively, are spending less time at the stove. On average, the two genders spend roughly 110 minutes combined cooking each day, compared to about 140 minutes per day in the 1970s, and closer to 150 minutes per day in the 1960s. The main driver of this trend has been a significant drop-off in the time women spend cooking.

Americans' growingdisinterest in cooking hasn'tmerely left households in front of a burner infrequentlyfrom a historical perspectiveit has led to a reality in which people in this country spend less time cooking each day than in any other developed nation, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Perhaps not so coincidentally, Americans also spend less time eating than people elsewhere in the world.

The reasons for the slow death of cooking in this country are many, but a fewstand out. For one, women, who traditionally have carried the brunt of thecooking load, are working more, and therefore spending less time at homecooking.In 2008, women spent 66 minutes per day cooking, almost 50 minutes fewer than in the 1960s, when they spent upwards of 112 minutes on average. Men, by comparison, areactually spending a bit more time at the stove, albeit only a meager 8 minutes more. So men have hardly made up the difference.

Read the original:
Wonkblog: The slow death of the home-cooked meal