24 Hour Emergency Tree Removal Toronto | Contact us today
24 Hour Emergency Tree Removal Toronto. We are a professional, affordable, and friendly tree removal service in Toronto Canada.
By: James Hess Channel
Read more:
24 Hour Emergency Tree Removal Toronto | Contact us today - Video
24 Hour Emergency Tree Removal San Diego CA (855)-385-4084
24 Hour Emergency Tree Removal San Diego CA Call (855) 385-4084 Now 24 hours a day 7 days a week! We look forward to hearing from you and helping with any pe...
By: RaymondAdrian Consulting
Read the original here:
24 Hour Emergency Tree Removal San Diego CA (855)-385-4084 - Video
24 Hour Emergency Tree Removal San Jose CA (855)-385-4084
24 Hour Emergency Tree Removal San Jose CA Call (855) 385-4084 Now 24 hours a day 7 days a week! We look forward to hearing from you and helping with any pes...
By: RaymondAdrian Consulting
Originally posted here:
24 Hour Emergency Tree Removal San Jose CA (855)-385-4084 - Video
Emergency Tree Removal Company Affordable Service Low Cost Cutting Pocono PA Call Now!
If you need a tree removed in Pocono area, we are there to help. Our prices are extremely competitive and our service is extremely professional. Call us and we will cut your trees for cheap...
By: Sergey Lucktinov
Read the original here:
Emergency Tree Removal Company Affordable Service Low Cost Cutting Pocono PA Call Now! - Video
Looking for a Tree Trimming service in Middleburg, FL?
Our company has been providing professional tree trimming tree removal services to Middleburg area residents for many years, and our success is built upon the quality of our work, attention...
By: Richard T. Forrest
Read more:
Looking for a Tree Trimming service in Middleburg, FL? - Video
New Bern aldermen agreed Tuesday on a policy to formalize the removal and replacement of trees on city property.
Matt Montanye, interim public works director, presented the policy and will bring it back to aldermen later for final approval.
Montanye said staff realize a clear policy for removal and replacement of trees was needed after two large trees on Spencer Avenue were marked for removal in April by the city public works when a property owner there asked for them to be removed. The city, mayor and aldermen received a lot of calls over that incident, he said.
In the past, there was never a formal policy for tree removals. The way the Spencer Avenue trees were handled is the way the city has always done it, Montanye said.
About two months ago, city staff, the Appearance Commission andParks and Recreation drafted a tree removal and replacement policy and procedures, Montanye said.
Mark Stephens, New Bern city manager, said the policy is basically how city workers are removing trees. But the new policy gives the Parks and Recreation Department more control of tree replacement once old, hazardous, diseased or obstructive trees have been removed, he said.
Other criteria for removing trees include: life expectancy of the tree; desirability of the species; amount of space needed for growth; quality and structural integrity; frequency of maintenance; feasibility and timeliness of planting a replacement tree; proximity and quality of trees near the one being considered for removal; past pruning and maintenance record; how much lateral damage is caused to infrastructure, streets, sidewalks and sewers; and location relative to streetlights, traffic control devices, intersection sight lines and space needed for growing.
Removing a tree will involve about 10 steps that start with filling out a form and turning it into the Parks and Recreation Department, Montanye said.
The tree will be evaluated and, if it needs to be removed, a 10-day notice will be placed on it. Appeals can be made within that 10 days to the director of Parks and Recreation, Montanye said.
If there is an appeal, a qualified person, not employed by the city, will do a separate evaluation of the tree and forward the information to the Appearance Commission for a final decision, according to the policy.
Read more:
City to formalize tree removal policy
MORRIS Preliminary work continues at the Morris Municipal Airport in preparations for its runway extension.
The Morris City Council on Tuesday unanimously approved contracting with Homer Tree Service for removal of 18 trees on airport property for $5,400. Airport liability insurance also was bought from Global Aerospace for just less than $13,800, the lowest bid.
The city plans to extend its north-south runway and taxiway to the north by 500 feet, making it 5,500 feet, to accommodate larger aircraft. Precision lights to make landings easier also is planned. After the north-south runway is extended, the project includes widening the runway from 75 to 100 feet and overlaying it with more asphalt to accommodate heavier aircraft.
The runway extension is the first of many improvement projects scheduled in the next five years aimed at making the airport more compatible for corporate jets.
The tree removal approved Tuesday will clear more space for the required runway protection zone, which is a larger area required with the increased length in the future runway, Mayor Richard Kopczick said Wednesday.
Were going to an instrument approach and a larger runway, and the trees pierce the approach pattern, he continued.
More than 30 trees already been have removed; Tuesdays action by the council approved working with Homer Tree Service to remove 18 more.
Were happy to have Whitman Road done and the new bridge, Alderman Julian Houston, chairman of the Airport Committee, said Wednesday.
As part of this project, the city had to obtain numerous parcels of land to accommodate the expansion. Whitman Road had to extended west of Ashley Road with a bridge and roadway, to provide residences on that road new access since the airport work no longer allows them direct access to Route 47.
Construction on the runway extension is expected to begin once the weather warms up, Houston said.
Read the original here:
Morris airport preparing for runway extension
Recommendation going to council
After hours of sometimes heated debates, an ad hoc committee that was formed to recommend changes to the citys tree protection laws has reached a verdict.
The citizen-led committee was formed by the Thousand Oaks City Council after the removal of scores of trees from Westlake Plaza last spring ignited public outrage.
A moratorium on sections of the tree law expires in May. The committees suggestions will be considered by the planning commission and the City Council before that time.
The group voted 6-4 on Jan. 20 to recommend that owner-planted exemptions for the removal of oak trees only be granted to requests from single-family residential properties, not commercial, and for not more than three trees.
Requests for more than three exemptions would require review by the planning commission.
For trees in parking areas, the committee recommended that any request for removal or relocation of more than three oak trees or more than five landmark trees be considered by the planning commission, regardless of whether the trees are indigenous or nursery grown.
Requests for removal or relocation of more than five protected landmark trees should be reviewed by the planning commission. City staff may review requests to remove five or fewer.
On Tuesday, committee members engaged in a two-hour tugof war as some defended the rights of property owners to cut down trees they planted themselves and expressed concern that too-strict laws would deter people from planting oak trees. Others feared that the recommendations would fail to protect enough trees.
Its a tough decision because there are people who dont want to see any oak trees removed, committee member Judy Lazar told the Acorn after the meeting. On the other hand, you want to have reasonable use of private property. I think (the decision) is a good compromise.
Originally posted here:
Board asks city to remove distinction between native, owner-planted trees
CHICO, Calif. -
PG&E presented the reasons Wednesday why trees lining the street near an Oroville cemetery have to be removed.
According to PG&E there are areas they have neglected for too long. The right away, which is the area directly above the pipelines have not been cared for as they should.
"We have allowed structures, patios, swimming pools and vegetation to exist very near and on top of our pipeline," said Chauna Moreland, director of gas safety program. "It's simply not acceptable, and we take full responsibility for that."
PG&E said they know trees near pipelines can be a risk to their employees and first responders, especially if they need to access a pipe in an emergency. They also know that third parties may dig into the pipe.
"What we didn't know, and were not aware of, is what roots are doing underneath the ground," explained Moreland.
The company conducted a study and found roots damage their pipeline by corroding them and leaving imprints.
"We know all those other items, trees are a risk to the pipeline, now we know roots interact with the pipelines as well," said Moreland.
Talk of relocating the pipeline across the street had been mentioned, but PG&E said it will take more time and effort, as well as have a serious impact on the community.
"It disrupts the community in terms of having to dig up streets and do additional construction activity," said Christine Cowsert Chapman, senior director of engineer gas operations.
Read the original post:
PG&E explains Oroville tree removal plan
BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP, Mich. (WJBK) -
A utility company chopped down trees to protect power lines but one resident calling it malicious has filed a lawsuit.
With the damage to her landscape done, Inge Gray and her attorney Geoffrey Fieger says DTE Energy and tree removal company Davey Tree have to pay.
The Bloomfield Township homeowner filed suit for $54 million for unlawful destruction. A number that Gray said comes when you add up the scope of the damage.
"The amount of trees they took, the age of the trees, the species of the trees, how it affects everyone's property value," Gray said.
It is a story you first saw on FOX 2 in December when 100-year-old trees in the back of her home off Kensington Road were completely removed.
In December, DTE had this to say:
"About half of the outages that we have on the electrical system come from trees," said Trevor Lauer, senior vice-president at DTE. "And the number one goal of removing trees is to reduce the number of outages."
At the time Gray said they weren't told about the plan to completely remove the trees. a matter DTE addressed in December.
"Clearly we had some customers that do not feel that they were notified in the appropriate manner," Lauer said at the time. "And that's something that we can learn from."
Read more:
$54 million lawsuit filed against DTE Energy for tree cutting