When you camp at your favorite State Park or plan a hunting a trip on your local State Wildlife Area (SWA), you likely havent given a second thought to natural resources that exist on those properties. However, you will notice when those resources are taken away or are no longer there. The landscape suddenly changes and our favorite open spaces do not seem so familiar. Such is the dilemma of Parks and Wildlife Managers when they consider long term habitat management projects and the impacts on our visitors.

One such project is the wetlands restoration project at Jackson Lake State Park and neighboring Jackson Lake and Andrick Ponds SWAs. At the heart of the restoration is the removal of 60-plus acres of Russian olive trees.

The invasive species is prevalent throughout Colorado and especially in areas where water is scarce. Originating from Southern Europe and Eastern Asia, the tree was planted throughout arid areas as windbreaks and for much needed shade on the sandy Great Plains.

When permitted to grow without management, the tree will take over pasture lands and wetland areas, increasing nitrogen in the soil and allowing for other noxious weeds to take root. Growing in dense groves allows this thorny tree to out-compete native plant species and to draw large amounts of moisture from the soil and waterways. Some estimates suggest that one tree will consume 75 gallons of water per day.

Impacts to wildlife are also great. Russian olives can create some habitat and food sources for local wildlife; however, with a forestry management plan that includes a diversity of trees and plants, wildlife diversity has been shown to also increase. Owls, bats, squirrels, and migratory birds are often unable to utilize RO groves for food and habitat. In some areas, RO trees have clogged ditches, destroyed fences and grown into roadways, causing a chain effect of destruction.

The first phase of the wetlands restoration project at Jackson Lake is set to begin this fall. CPW land managers will use a phased three-year approach to address the most immediate needs such as those areas where trees have impacted infrastructure or pose a threat to property. Removal and treatment in these areas will limit large impacts on wildlife and allow for immediate replanting of native plants. Cottonwood, willow, chokecherry, plum and other native species will be planted to provide quality wildlife habitat.

Previous work on other CPW areas has shown that native species are very hardy and will rebound to fill the void created by RO removal. In most cases this creates a new opportunity for shade on your campsite or for habitat on your next hunt. While the landscape will change over time, the goal is to make your CPW lands continue to feel familiar with each visit.

Park visitors can help inform management decisions by recording observations of plants or animals through phone apps like iNaturalist. Various areas of the park may be closed during project hours; check with the Visitor Center for current closures.

Original post:
3-year project to remove Russian olive trees around Jackson Lake to begin this fall - Fort Morgan Times

More than three weeks after Isaias blew through Connecticut, cleanup continues. Tree removal crews are still catching up, working very long days.

We are running from five in the morning to eightat night. As long as there is light, we are working, said Joe Brege of B&MTree Service in West Hartford.

Now, as Thursdays forecast calls for high winds andpotentially severe thunderstorms, more work could lie ahead.

Anything that we thought that might cause a problem for tomorrow's storm or this weekend's storm that's what we are doing for the next couple of days, explained Brege.

While tree crewsprepare, some wonder about Eversource. Isaias left more than 600,000 householdswithout power, leaving some wondering if Eversource will be more prepared nexttime severe weather strikes.

Lets hope thatthey learned a lesson and that they will be, said Steve Lancor who was withoutpower for three days at his West Hartford home.

A spokesperson for Eversource said theyve seen Thursdays forecast and are preparing.

We are fully staffed. We have line workers, tree crew, support staff all ready to respond if there are outages, said Eversource spokesperson Tricia Modifica.

If needed, Eversource said they have also contracted crews from elsewhere to assist with restoring power if necessary.

They will all be prepositioned around the state in advance of the storm so theyre ready to respond to any damage caused by the weather were expecting, said Modifica.

Meanwhile, people in recently hard-hit area are also taking precautionary measures.

Grab a generator. Get the candles out. Get the matches. Put food away. Get out a cooler. Get some ice." Those are all things West Hartfords Adriana Nace said shes considering as Thursdays weather approaches.

Visit link:
Eversource Says It's Prepared For Potentially Severe Weather Thursday - NBC Connecticut

Caution tape warns of potential live wires as a fallen tree blocks the roadway of Hemlock Lane on August 8, 2020 in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Caution tape warns of potential live wires as a fallen tree blocks the roadway of Hemlock Lane on August 8, 2020 in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Photo: Matthew Brown / Hearst Connecticut Media

Caution tape warns of potential live wires as a fallen tree blocks the roadway of Hemlock Lane on August 8, 2020 in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Caution tape warns of potential live wires as a fallen tree blocks the roadway of Hemlock Lane on August 8, 2020 in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Wilton seeks sanctions as intervenor in Eversource hearing

WILTON Outraged by Eversources responses to power outages, the town of Wilton has been designated an intervenor in an upcoming hearing about the power companys actions following Tropical Storm Isaias.

As an intervenor, the town is allowed to submit evidence, put forward interrogatories, receive data and information files by other parties and intervenors, and file briefs. The town is also requesting sanctions and/or penalties against Eversource.

In our intervenor status we will be providing testimony, said First Selectwoman Lynne Vanderslice.

The hearing is being held by the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) which is investigating the storm response from Eversource Energy and the states other utility company, United Illuminating. A hearing date has not yet been scheduled.

Heavy winds from the Aug. 4 storm knocked out power for more than 800,000 Eversource customers statewide. In Wilton, 5,517 Eversource customers lost electricity 73.25 percent of the town.

It took more than a week for power to be restored to all homes in Wilton.

Upon announcing the investigation, the chair of PURA said Eversource badly underestimated the threat of the storm by preparing only for between 125,000 and 380,000 outages, far from the actual total.

Vanderslice said she plans to join other town officials and mayors who will be testifying at the hearing. We will all tell the same story of a delayed make-safe response leaving thousands of residents stranded; of Eversource crews sitting idle for hours waiting for instructions; of the lack of access to operations; and the failure of the outage-reporting system, she said.

Overall, she said, Eversource lacked communication and coordination during the power restoration process. Eversource did not coordinate with police as to where their crews were. DPW (Department of Public Works) was waiting for power crews and was ready to assist them, but no one showed up. Residents were frustrated with an inability to get information as to their power restoration, she said.

Among the relief Wilton wants from Eversource is the requirement of a Make Safe crew to be installed in the town within a certain timeframe of a storm. The town also wants an operational person assigned to Wilton who can serve as a point of contact among Eversource, the town, and its emergency services.

Vanderslice encourages Wilton residents who had problems with Eversources storm response to consider forming a grass roots advocacy group in protest.

She pointed to the success of the citizens group Hands Off Our Schools. Last year, that group, which started in Wilton, held protests and traveled to the State Capitol in buses to testify against proposed school regionalization bills. As a result, two regionalization bills died in the state legislature, while regionalization language was removed from a third one.

When residents take to the streets or take the matter into their own hands, legislators listen, Vanderslice said.

Eversource generated profits last year of $411 million from its historic Connecticut Light & Power operations.

The town can also take a more proactive approach in preventing power outages through increased tree removal in certain areas where trees are blocking power lines, Vanderslice said.

In the last few years, we have increased the towns budget for tree removals, but we need to increase it even more, she said. We need to have a discussion about our priorities in terms of what actions we are going to take about trees in order to mitigate these situations, she said.

More than 70 percent of Wilton is covered by trees, Vanderslice said, citing a report by the Western Connecticut Council of Governments (WestCOG). Thats a huge number of trees, she said.

She suggested enacting a town ordinance that would facilitate the removal of diseased or potentially dying trees, and regulate the planting of new trees within the town right of way and within a specified distance of utility wires.

If you plant a tree that can grow 40 feet high near wires, that could be a problem. While trees that grow 12 to 15 feet high pose no problem falling on wires, she said.

She plans to work on a draft of the tree ordinance with Mike Conklin, the towns director of environmental affairs and Planning Director Michael Wrinn.

pgay@wiltonbulletin.com

Here is the original post:
Wilton seeks sanctions as intervenor in Eversource hearing - The Wilton Bulletin

The story below is from ourSeptember/October 2020issue. For more stories like it,Subscribe Today. Thank you!

When Will Smith and his wife, Caitlin, landed jobs with the Roanoke Ballet Theatre, he thought their prayer was answered. Then COVID-19 struck and he remembered his great-grandfather.

Will and Caitlin Smith got what he calls a once in a lifetime opportunity with the Roanoke Ballet Theatre as part of a new professional ballet company, and there was every reason to believe the couple was set for the future.

Of course, they hadnt counted on COVID-19. And their daughter Lucy hadnt come along, either.

Now, however, theres little Lucy, social distancing, masks, a ballet company on indefinite hold and a couple of newwhether or not temporarycareers.

Will has become the Dancing Lumberjack and Caitlin has fallen back onto individual Pilates instruction. Both teach a little ballroom dancing when the opportunity arises.

The Pilates and cutting trees are not really new in the shiny sense. Caitlin has been learning and teaching Pilates for nearly three years, in addition to her ballet work, and Wills lumberjacking genes go back to his grandfather.

Will, 33, and Caitlin, 31, met when they were with a ballet company in D.C., a city with a lifestyle that Will describes as craziness. Roanoke looked ideal when the professional ballet positions were open at what had been a school and we could get in on the ground floor, he says.

The new ballet group was a challenge. The first couple years were super difficult, says Will. The ballet wasnt getting support as fast as we thought it would and the company couldnt pay us the wages we were used to in D.C., so we had to find second jobs. We both started off teaching dance, but then during the summers when my teaching would dry up, I would have to find summer work.

Will worked at Ramulose Ridge Vinyards for a couple of summers and loved it, but the commute made for very long days. He got a job with the Holiday Inn as a night auditor, another brutal schedule. Then came an opportunity with his friend Jesse Dunker with Alpha and Omega Tree removal and landscaping. Dunker has served as a mentor for Will.

Caitlin had begun teaching Pilates on the side and loved the exciting classes with a range of men and women students. Meanwhile, Will got a job teaching ballroom dancing, but everything fell apart except the tree work with COVID-19.

As I did more and more of [the tree work], I really began to not just enjoy it, but love it. The first time I climbed a tree, I felt that fear, that pressure. That little voice that tells you to quit was screaming in my head. I took a breath, dug deep and continued climbing, and I knew this was something I could do.

As a theatrical guy, Will created The Dancing lumberjack as a business [phone: 410-972-1039] and as a character. My great-grandfather was a lumberjack and he was a big, burly man. Im a skinny ballet dancer, so I wanted to take two things that seem worlds apart and put them together.

He has started a blog aiming to make it about dance, trees and everything in between. His tree work is mostly for homeowners and small businesses.

Caitlin, who has had to give up her large Pilates class for now, still teaches one-on-one. She was worried about Will climbing trees with a chain saw at first, but she finally reasoned that the risk is about the same as ballet, a sport where injury is nearly as commonand often as severeas it is in football.

Will speaks for both dancers when he says, Being a ballet dancer feeds my soul but not my pocketbook, so my goal is to work towards my arborist and climbing certification so the dancing lumberjack can feed my pocketbook.

Meanwhile, Lucy, who was born in May, has been the beneficiary of the job juggle because she has had a virtually full-time mom and a dad who gets to spend a good bit of time with her, as well.

Will is philosophical. With the future of the art of ballet and other performing arts looking a bit bleak [at least temporarily], I might have to make the trees my stage for now.

The storyabove isfrom ourSeptember/October 2020issue. For the full storysubscribetodayor view ourFREEdigital edition.Thank you for supportinglocal journalism!

Here is the original post:
The Dancing Lumberjack: Living the Dream - Roanoker

The Perry City Hall issued an update Wednesday on the ongoing storm response and cleanup efforts.

Debris Removal Process

City of Perry cleaning crews, working with contractor partners, have been through the entire town once. Beginning Wednesday, Aug. 26, the crews began a second pass through the town in order to collect storm debris. Alley pickups will also begin at this time.

The crews will only go through the alleys for special pickup requests. To schedule a special alley pickup, call the Perry City Hall 515-465-2481 as soon as possible.

Once the second round of storm debris pickup is completed, residents will thereafter have to haul their storm debris to the dump site at the campground parking lot in Pattee Park.

Residents are asked to avoid parking on the street in front of debris piles. Parked vehicles obstruct the progress and make removing the debris extremely difficult.

As crews move through the town, hanging branches will be removed from trees on the parking or right-of-way. Branches that are too large for city crews to remove will be removed by a tree contractor. The city will also prioritize the tree removal list at this time.

Street Cleaning Continues

Due to an issue with their equipment, the street cleaning crew will return Thursday, Aug. 27, Friday, Aug. 28 and possibly Saturday, Aug. 29 in order to clear the gutters and vacuum out the storm drains. Residents are asked to remove their parked vehicles from the street, if possible, on those days so the streets, gutters and storm drains can be cleaned.

Garbage Collection

Residential garbage collection is back to the regular schedule. Residents may still bring household garbage to the recycle dumpsters at the McCreary Community Building parking lot, PHS football field parking lot and the parking lot east of the Police Department until Friday, Aug. 28. Beginning Monday, Aug. 31, these dumpsters will once again be used for recyclable drop-off only.

The Perry City Hall also expressed its gratitude to its resident and contractors for their hard collaboration following the unprecedented derecho storm:

Thank you to all of our partners assisting with the cleanup effort: Repp Trucking, J. Pettiecord Inc., Elder Corp., Walton Tree Removal Service, Landus Cooperative, Herbs Backhoe and all of the Perry residents who not only took care of their own properties, but gave a hand to their friends and neighbors, too! This is Perry Pride!

Read this article:
City cleanup crews start second pass through town Wednesday - theperrynews.com

Ash trees in Alta that have been extensively trimmed due to the emerald ash borer infestation.

An insect which attacks and kills ash trees has brought changes to Alta over the past 3 years. Infestation of the emerald ash borer brought on by beetles has damaged hundreds of ash trees in Alta, and the city has been working to trim and remove the affected trees to stop the spread of infection.

According to Alta street and sanitation supervisor Brad Pedersen, about 18-20% of the infected trees have been removed, more than 50 trees so far, out of 330 that originally were scheduled for removal in the city right of way. We have several years yet, Pedersen said of the project.

The infestation, believed to have been brought to Buena Vista County and other Iowa counties on pallets from China, has taken a toll on Alta residents visually and on the city government financially. Mayor Kevin Walsh is concerned. This seems to be ongoing news but I am not sure the average person realizes the impact the ash bore has had on our community, he said.

Trees on the south end of main street or in the city park will show just how sad this community is going to look when all the trees are finally removed, Mayor Walsh said. This is not only bad in this way but it is also a burden on our city budget that we wish we could spend the money elsewhere. Our city employees have had to cut back on some things they would normally do in the summer to take care of infested trees.

The adult beetle that infects ash trees is metallic green in color and is about 1/2 inch long, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The city continues to pay three tree trimming companies and additional summer workers to help with tree removal and trimming. Pedersen informed Alta City Council that his department will continue to work hard through August and after.

The removed branches are being put to good use. Instead of dumping the branches, they are being used for firewood, Pedersen said.

Excerpt from:
Miscellaneous: Beetle infestation changes the face of Alta (8/28/20) - Pilot Tribune

An interim tree-cutting bylaw may not be in Huntsvilles immediate future, but environmental protections are on the way, according to the latest Town of Huntsville committee talks.

Town staff confirmed during an online general committee meeting held Aug. 26 that a proposed community planning permit bylaw remained the fastest and most effective tool to combat worrisome site alteration and tree removal.

Mayor Karin Terziano noted that, after further investigation, an interim tree cutting bylaw, for example, likely wouldnt come into effect any sooner.

Councillors had previously tasked staff with researching interim controls on site alteration and vegetation removal in advance of the proposed community planning permit bylaws anticipated May 2021 implementation.

The direction came after tree removal off Forbes Hill Drive and other properties caused highly visible barrens or environmental concerns, sparked public outcry and renewed calls for action.

A number of proposed housing developments also have some residents eager to implement environmental and human health protections in advance against unnecessary site alterations or tree removal.

A community planning permit bylaw would combine zoning, site plan and minor variance approval processes, and introduce site alteration and vegetation removal restrictions, for development applications.

But committee members asked how the bylaw would prevent alteration or vegetation removal if no development application was planned.

Committee didnt seem concerned with every potential alteration, like felling a tree for winter heating fuel for example, but rather unnecessarily extreme cases that created a risk of damage to the environment or neighbouring properties.

Staff clarified that the community planning permit bylaw could have the power to require a permit for site alteration or vegetation removal, regardless of whether the property owner planned to apply for a development permit.

We would be able to require a permit for that level of site alteration through that bylaw, said staff.

And that would likely act as a deterrent, too.

Staff added enforcement of the bylaw would likely be based on complaints, as are other municipal bylaws.

The town is in the process of hiring a consultant to lead the creation of a community planning permit bylaw, which will include public consultations.

More:
Huntsville to plant tree protection in 2021 community planning permit bylaw - Muskoka Region News

Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears is a blog series documenting the harmful impact of President Trumps judges on Americans rights and liberties. Cases in the series can be found by issue and by judge at this link.

Trump Ninth Circuit judge Kenneth Lee tried in dissent to permit the US Forest Service to proceed with a project that would allow private logging companies to remove trees and log millions of board feet of timber in an area near a fire that had been put out in a national forest, without assessing the environmental impact of the project. The majority of a 3-judge panel, including a judge appointed by George W. Bush, rejected these arguments and ordered a preliminary injunction against the Forest Service that would require it to assess the projects environmental effects in its August 2020 decision in Environmental Protection Information Center (EPIC) v. Carlson.

In 2018, a fire caused extensive damage In Northern California, including to the Mendocino National Forest. The US Forest Service then approved a project to solicit bids from private logging companies to cut down and remove large trees with some fire damage up to 200 feet from either side of roads in the National Forest. The project authorizes logging of millions of board feet of timber on nearly 4,700 acres of National Forest land.

Despite the environmental impact of the project, the Forest Service did not prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or Environmental Assessment (EA), as usually occurs and is required by law. Instead, it claimed that the project was covered by an existing Categorical Exclusion (CE) in federal regulations from those requirements for road repair and maintenance. The environmental group EPIC disagreed that the CE covered the project and filed suit, seeking a preliminary injunction against the project until an EIS or EA was performed. A lower court ruled for the Forest Service and EPIC appealed.

The majority of a 3-judge panel on the Ninth Circuit, in an opinion by Judge William Fletcher joined by George W., Bush appointee Benjamin Settle, reversed and ordered a preliminary injunction against the project until the Forest Service performs an EIS or EA. Fletcher explained that EPIC was likely to succeed on the merits because the unambiguous repair and maintenance CE clearly does not include the work to be done on the logging project. Although removal of a dead or dying tree right next to the road could fall within repair and maintenance, Fletcher went on, the CE cannot reasonably be interpreted to cover commercial logging of large trees up to 200 feet away from hundreds of miles of roads. The majority also rejected a new argument by the Forest Service that a CE for salvage logging applied, since the project does not target only trees that pose an immediate danger to travelers as the CE requires.

The majority also found that the other criteria for a preliminary injunction were met. An affidavit and other materials showed irreparable harm to the environment if the project were allowed to proceed at this point, including diminish[ment] of individuals use and enjoyment of the National Forest. The balance of hardships and the public interest also favored an injunction, the majority continued, since it would require only a delay at this point so that the Forest Service would fulfill its obligation to perform an EIS or EA.

Trump judge Kenneth Lee dissented. Although he stated that he shared some of the majoritys concerns about the project, he maintained that the court should defer to the Forest Service and the lower court that denied an injunction. He noted that without the revenue that the project would generate, the Forest Service could be forced to close roads and recreation areas. The Forest Service decision to include the project within the CE was not arbitrary and capricious, he maintained, and the lower court did not abuse its discretion in denying a preliminary injunction.

As the majority explained, however, the lower court did abuse its discretion because it did not get the law right since it clearly misinterpreted the CE. Under no reasonable interpretation of its language, the majority noted, does the project come within the CE for repair and maintenance of roads. The majority also noted that the fact that the Forest Service relies on commercial logging operations to finance some of its work can put the Forest Service in an awkward and conflicted position in deciding on the authorization of such projects. The majority pointed out that simply requiring an honest environmental assessment of the project as required by law, which could lead to alternatives that would still include logging but have less environmental impact, would not harm the Forest Services legitimate objectives.

The Forest Service will accordingly be required to complete an environmental assessment of the impact of its proposed logging project before it can proceed. If it had been up to Trump judge Lee, however, that would not be the case, risking significant environmental injury.

Follow this link:
Trump Judge Tries to Permit Forest Service to Proceed with Commercial Logging of Trees Without Assessing Environmental Impact: Confirmed Judges...

Residents in Twickenham have protested the felling of trees by a Volkswagen dealership in South Rd, TW2.

On Wednesday (August 25), neighbours stood under trees to prevent them being cut down, as contractors removed shrubbery and trees on private land belonging to Citygate Automotive.

Objectors argued that some trees were protected by a Tree Preservation Order, and said that the shrubbery was vital in shielding houses from the industrial view of air-conditioners, advertising, floodlights and cars.

Paul Warrington, a member of South Road Residents Association, said:

This was an entirely peaceful move on the part of the residents who wanted the contractors to pull back, take a deep breath and for everyone to discuss matters with the council.

When we saw the first tree being mutilated, a couple of residents went over and stood under the tree and refused to move until the contractors stopped.

Later on in the day, VW continued their scorched earth policy and removed all of the mature landscaping in front of the site which has been there for years for public and residential amenity.

There is now nothing left apart from a few mutilated trees. One of the residents who has been living on the road since 1982 was in tears."

Director of the car dealership, Peter Wood, responded that landscaping was part of their maintenance programme. He said:

Citygate Automotive Ltd acquired the Twickenham facility in January of this year, which was in a very poor state of disrepair. After seeking advice and guidance from the council, we have begun a programme of tree pruning and maintenance to the area facing onto South Road.

This area has been significantly neglected over many years and has also become home to significant volumes of rubbish, bottles and general waste. Our intention has only ever been to improve this property and the surrounding area, which we are now very close to completing.

However, residents fear there is more at stake, after Lidl on South Road removed landscaping earlier in the year.

Residents Ian and Audrey Simmons said:

Is this the end of the leafy suburbs of Twickenham?

A spokesperson from Richmond Council responded:

This week the Council responded to reports of tree work being carried out on a strip of private land in South Road, Twickenham. An Arboricultural Officer attended site and found that a protected tree was in the process of being pruned; this work was halted immediately, and the Council is now investigating further.

Whilst on site the company undertaking works expressed an intention to remove and prune other dead trees, that do not have protected status, to address their relationship, including contact, with the adjacent building. Council officers inspected these trees and did not object to the proposed actions.

More:
Residents in clash to protect Twickenham trees from removal - Richmond and Twickenham Times

Related Guides: Stump Removal, Stump Removal Cost Guide, Stump Grinding

Tree Removal Cost Summary

Price range = $150 to $1,500+Average cost = $500-$1000Best/cheapest price = $150

In this guide, we will show you how much it costs to have a variety of tree types removed from your property. Theres no cut-and-dry way to determine the exact cost to remove a tree, so these are meant to serve as guidelines. For example, the complexity of the job and the height of the tree are just two pricing factors. Costs may also vary a lot depending on the condition and location of the tree.

The average cost to remove a tree ranges from $150 to $1,500. But other tree services may cost extra. For example, the average stump removal cost ranges from $60 to $350 and the average stump grinding costs $75-$1,000 depending on numerous factors.

There are many different levels of service available when removing a tree, but a few basic pieces are usually included. Obviously, the tree will be need to be chopped down. Typically, the contractor will also have to rope down pieces of the tree by climbing the tree and cutting it into more manageable sizes. In many cases, it may also be hauled away at no extra charge (or this is included in the estimate). For other considerations, see our complete guide on what to ask when hiring a tree removal service.

Some people want more than a basic tree removal service. For example, if the price doesnt include hauling away tree limbs, you may have to pay extra for limb removal. Tree limb removal costs vary, but it is usually between $50 and $75.

Additional services that may be added on for an extra fee include:

Now that you have a feel for what the little extras are going to cost, you are probably wondering how much youll actually have to pay to have the tree removed. This will largely depend on the size of the tree:

There is no realistic way for an average homeowner to safely remove a large tree from his or her property. You definitely dont want to attempt this type of job yourself. One thing to be aware of right away is that its going to be expensive. The total cost of the job is calculated based on a number of different factors. If the workers have to climb really high and rope down many pieces before actually felling the tree, which is usually the case with extremely tall trees, the total bill is going to be quite high. As noted above, you could pay $1,500 or more for that level of service. It may be worth it to try to have a few small extras thrown in for free, but not all companies are willing to do so.

If a tree falls on your property, you will probably want to clear it away as quickly as possible. Although this job isnt nearly as risky or complicated as removing a healthy, living tree, it still requires a lot of equipment and can lead to injuries if youre not careful. The good news is that the cost to remove a fallen tree is typically a lot lower than removing a standing tree. All told, you will probably pay between $75 and $150 for the work. As with removing a standing tree though, the total price will depend on whether you have it hauled completely away, cut up or just chipped up into tiny pieces.

Oak is one of the strongest, toughest woods out there. For that reason, tree removal services often charge a premium to tackle them. Oak trees are also very tall. The average height of a healthy oak tree is 60 feet. You can refer to the price guide above to see that you will pay between $200 and $1,000 to have an oak tree removed. Due to the fact that oak is such a solid, thick wood, your total price will probably fall on the higher end of the scale. Make sure you have a really good reason to have it removed before spending that kind of money!

There are many species of pine tree out there, but generally, the average height of a pine tree is between 40 and 60 feet. Some varieties soar up to 80 feet though. As you already know, the total amount that youll pay to have a tree removed depends on how large it is. If you have a smaller pine tree, you might pay as little as $200 or so. If your pine tree is extremely tall though, you could pay $1,500 or more. This is another example of why it pays to collect quite a few tree removal quotes before hiring a contractor.

What if you just need to have a few branches removed from a tree? If they are interfering with power lines, just pick up the phone and call your local utility company. They should come out and handle it at no cost. If you need a branch or branches to be removed for other reasons, you will have to hire a tree removal and cutting company. Obviously, if the branches are really small, you can probably do it yourself. In the event that you need to hire a professional, you can expect to be charged an hourly rate. Most companies charge between $200 and $300 per hour. If you have a lot of branches that need to be removed, it could end up being pretty expensive.

Stump removal prices vary depending on many different things. The cost to remove a stump will vary depending on whether you do it yourself or hire a professional, but other factors come into play as well. By learning about the costs that are associated with removing a tree stump, you will be able to avoid unpleasant surprises. Learn more with our Tree Stump Removal Cost Guide.

As noted several times throughout this article, the total cost of having a tree removed will depend on many different factors. Heres a recap of the main factors:

After a major storm or high winds, a tree may crash and cause damage to a house or other object. Tree removal services usually charge a lot more to remove these types of trees. The main reason for the higher price is because they have to be careful to not cause additional damage. Also, damaged trees pose more risks in general as workers are more likely to be injured.

Although it may seem like a major expense to have a tree safely removed by the experts, its well worth it. By letting the professionals handle it for you, you will be able to avoid serious injuries and other problems. Besides, removing a tree isnt easy. Why not let the pros handle it for you?

To keep your yard looking as attractive as possible, you periodically need to have its trees trimmed into shape. In addition to making a tree look more aesthetically pleasing, trimming or pruning can be used to remove dead or broken limbs that can pose serious hazards. The cost of tree trimming varies depending on a number of factors including whether you do it yourself or hire a professional contractor. Learn more with our Tree Trimming Cost Guide.

Go here to read the rest:
How Much Does Tree Removal Cost? Tree Removal