Tree Removal Hornsby, North Shore Upper
Solving tree removal problems in Hornsby, North Shore Upper, Northern Suburbs, Hills District Lower Central Coast for 35 years, Call: (02) 8072-4144.

By: Tree Removal Hornsby

Excerpt from:
Tree Removal Hornsby, North Shore Upper - Video

Unplanned Tree Removal
My First Project.

By: homotorsports

Read the original:
Unplanned Tree Removal - Video

Arborists Auckland - Oakwood Treecare
Auckland Arborists from Oakwood Treecare - Removing a large tree from a Golf course in Auckland. Oakwood Arborists are all professionally trained qualified. Oakwood Treecare has 20 years...

By: Tree Services - Oakwood Treecare Consultancy

See the article here:
Arborists Auckland - Oakwood Treecare - Video

Vietnamese Tree Removal
1. Cut 2. Shake 3. Jump and swing 4. Shake.

By: David Arnold

See more here:
Vietnamese Tree Removal - Video

Palm Tree Removal Spring Valley Challenge Dr. Campo Road A Tree Surgeon
Tree Removal Spring Valley Ca. 91977 Best Tree Company in Town Call A Tree Surgeon For a quick quote 619-381-0763 Be sure to visit http://www.atreesurgeon.com http://www.removaltrees.com.

By: Daniel Mascari

See the original post:
Palm Tree Removal Spring Valley Challenge Dr. Campo Road A Tree Surgeon - Video

FORT WAYNE Fort Waynes river levees have been spared from a federal tree-removal order, but theyre not out of the woods yet.

President Barack Obama signed into law Tuesday the Water Resources Reform and Development Act, which contains a provision that could prevent the elimination of woody vegetation along 10.2 miles of city levees.

The levee measure, drafted by Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-3rd, eliminates guidance by the Army Corps of Engineers in 2009 for the removal of trees and bushes larger than 2 inches in diameter from earthen flood barriers nationwide. The Army Corps believes levees are weakened by tree roots and burrowing animals attracted by plant cover.

Fort Wayne Mayor Tom Henry had endorsed Stutzmans amendment to the water resources bill, which was approved in May by the House and the Senate.

This has a major impact, not only on Fort Wayne, but on other communities across the country, city government spokesman John Perlich said in an email. Our rivers are a key asset as we invest in the community and protect the environment.

When he introduced the legislation last year, Stutzman said it would save Fort Waynes government $25 million in tree-removal costs. The city spent $600,000 in recent years to remove vegetation from and rebuild 1,100 feet of levee along Edgewater Avenue.

Stutzmans provision requires the Army Corps to consider regional characteristics, habitat for species of concern, and levee performance before ordering the removal of vegetation from a specific flood wall. So its possible the agency might still want trees and bushes yanked from levees in Fort Wayne and elsewhere.

The Army Corps will develop implementation guidance for the provisions of the water resources act, agency spokesman Pete Pierce said.

I cant really speculate on what they may say in the end, he said.

Perlich said, Well continue to work with the Army Corps of Engineers to ensure that our levees remain safe while preserving the riverbanks around them.

Go here to see the original:
City skirts flood-levee rule for now

HUNTINGTON, Wv. - Trees downed by the wind were the main cause of power outages in Tuesday night's brief but impactful storm, according to insurance agents and Appalachian Power.

It is the power company's responsibility to restore power lost due to down trees, but it is not always the insurance company's responsibility to clean up the mess.

"There were trash cans and dust just flying through the middle of downtown," recalls insurance company owner, Tom Gesner, as he looks at the four-foot wide oak tree laying on the front lawn of his business on 6th Avenue.

Luckily, for Gesner, the tree was technically owned by the city of Huntington. Gesner says he heard from the city that Huntington maintenance crews will remove the tree.

If the tree were on Gesner's side of the sidewalk to begin with, the insurance agent would have probably had to pay some money out-of-pocket to get the tree removed.

Gesner explains that's because the tree, as massive as it is, did not hit or lean against his building.

"It would not typically be covered by an insurance policy from a lot of companies, because it's just laying in the yard," says Gesner.

Three doors down, a smaller tree, that could be more easily removed by someone who is not a professional, is leaning against a building. That detail makes the situation one that is worthy of a claim.

Wind damage is covered by almost all insurance companies, according to Gesner, but an unmovable tree that is not touching a home is not worthy of a claim.

Gesner, an Erie Insurance seller, offers insurance that would cover removal of a non-damaging tree after a deductible.

View original post here:
Tree and debris removal, at times, must be paid for by homeowner

The mother duck flew away when she was startled by workmen but later returned to collect her ducklings and work to fell the tree continued

Fran Strachan

Thames Ditton ducks

A family of ducks attempted to thwart the councils removal of a 200-year-old cedar tree in Thames Ditton this week.

After a battle over whether to cut down the tree, with some residents wanting it to stay and others agreeing with Surrey County Council that it was a health and safety hazard, work on the tree on the corner of Queens Drive and Kings Drive began on Monday (June 9).

But the next day, after the lower branches were removed, a family of ducks was found in the tree and work had to stop.

Fran Strachan, a resident of Queens Drive, said: Some people think it is a danger but it is a beautiful tree.

She said that the person whose house it was directly outside was worried about it falling on their home, especially after some branches fell in recent storms.

A county council spokesman said: This is a huge mature cedar tree and we have been trying to prolong its life over the years with the help of bolts, cables and braces. Unfortunately, earlier this year a large heavy limb fell from the tree, not injuring anybody but requiring us to take action. We looked into a number of possibilities but the only way to guarantee safety was to fell the tree.

Read the original:
Family of ducks halt controversial tree felling

Lovegrove trees still under threat

The public campaign from Tree Street residents has reignited after Bunbury Deputy Mayor Brendan Kelly warned the trees on Lovegrove Avenue could be removed.

The Friends of Lovegrove residents group thought they had won in their campaign against the councils proposal to alter Lovegrove into a one-way street and remove five trees for more parking bays.

Instead, the council last week agreed in a drawn-out debate to a compromise proposal to retain the trees.

However, on Friday, Deputy Mayor Brendan Kelly told the group there was nothing in the decision preventing the trees being removed when the council completed its drainage works on the street.

This is despite council voting 6-5 against a proposal to remove the trees during the meeting.

If an extra ten car parks on the northern side of Lovegrove Avenue will enhance safety, then in order to find room for those car parks the trees will go, Cr Kelly said.

Tree removal is likely to happen in any case to facilitate the necessary planned drainage works.

There should be no allusions about what will happen as the work for extra car-parking and new drainage in Lovegrove Avenue proceeds.

Mayor Gary Brennan said the trees could be removed during the street upgrade, but only if they were damaged.

See more here:
Lovegrove trees still under threat

Tree Removal Raleigh |Tree Care
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k9Sajx9Fts Tree Removal Raleigh |Tree Care We can provide the expert, professional tree removal service you need. We also pro...

By: Mark Henry

Read more:
Tree Removal Raleigh |Tree Care - Video