OLDHAM COUNTY, Ky. Some people in Oldham Co. are now trying to save the old courthouse in La Grange.

The countys Project Development Board recently voted to demolish it and build a new one.

Some residents are doing what they can to fight the decision.

Barbara Manley Calloway grew up in Oldham County. The courthouse has always been a symbol of town and county pride that, in part, has existed for more than a century.

It has stood here as the anchor to this town, Manley Calloway said.

When she found out about plans to demolish the courthouse, Manley Calloway formed a plan of her own.

Somebodys got to do something and I thought well, you know, if not me, who else? Manley Calloway said.

She started a Facebook page to save the courthouse that got 1,700 likes in its first week.

Manley Calloway asked Preservation Kentucky and The Heritage Council of Kentucky for help.

But, it might not be enough.

No matter how many likes, comments, or shares the page gets, Judge Executive David Voegele says the courthouse is just not salvageable.

You cant even raise the facade, it might fall apart, said Voegele.

He says efforts to save the building are misinformed.

People dont know whats behind the walls, they dont know whats in the ceiling, said Voegele. They dont know whats underneath it. They just have a knee jerk reaction to a circumstance that they dont like.

RELATED: Committee votes to demolish Oldham County Courthouse, making room for new building to serve next 100 years

Voegele asked a restoration expert to examine the building and he agrees - nothing can be done to save the building.

But the vote to demolish the building wont stop Barbara Manley Calloway.

My momma always told me, and the one lesson I learned from her is, never let anybody tell you no, you cant do something, Manley Calloway said.

Voegle will publish an article in Wednesdays Oldham Era, debunking some misconceptions about the courthouse and the project.

Make it easy to keep up-to-date with more stories like this. Download the WHAS11 News app now. ForAppleorAndroidusers.

Have a news tip? Emailassign@whas11.com, visit ourFacebook pageorTwitter feed.

Excerpt from:
Oldham County residents form group to save the courthouse from demolition - WHAS11.com

The way of life is that everything gets demoed.

When it comes to demolition in your home the goals are to be surgical, precise, clean, and efficient.

Trickier than it looks, but it can be easier than it looks.

The secret to a successful demolition project is to understand that things are only strong in limited ways

So Dean Sharp decided to share all sorts of tips, tricks, and techniques to demoing. Check them out below:

Safety gear:

Enough but not too much

Breathing protection

Gloves

Long sleeves

Hard hats and visors

Steal toed boots

The safest item for demo a friend

Prep:

Dig Alert - 811

Power off

Water off

Gas off

Ventilation

Cleaning:

Shop vacs

Plastic

Brooms & dust pans or shovels (debris, coal, snow)

Tools:

It's better to use tools of precision than blunt instruments

Hammers - demo, sledge

Saws - sawmill, circular

Wonder bar, cats paw

Breaker bar

Large hand held cutter pliers

Technique:

Drywall - pull it off or push it off from the back side

Framing - slam studs sideways, cut nails with saw

Plumbing - cut threaded pipes unless theres a union

Electrical - test for power

Cut wires first

Concrete - the most intimidating of demo tools

Brittle is the key

Begin at edges so cracked pieces have somewhere to go, room to move

Have water ready if using a saw

For more information, listen to Dean explain it all below:

See the article here:
The Art of Demolition | Home with Dean Sharp - KFI AM 640

Alison Bosma abosma@wickedlocal.com @AlisonBosma

FridayJan24,2020at7:38PMJan24,2020at7:39PM

TOPLINE: It could cost the town $160,000 to demolish a vacant and badly run-down warehouse at 72 Depot St., according to early estimates.

A LITTLE BACKGROUND: The town has been trying to take a wrecking ball to this building for years, but the owner is in failing health and company funds necessary for demolition are tied up in court, the town's attorney has said. The town took matters into its own hands at the beginning of the year, after the property owner failed to meet a final deadline. That means the town will have to take on the cost of the demolition, but will try to recoup money through litigation or foreclosing, owning, then reselling the property.

WHAT'S THE HOLDUP? The town is working through a checklist of things that need to be done before demolition, from shutting down utilities, to working with the state on asbestos, to eradicating an out-of-control rodent infestation.

WHAT'S NEW? An estimate for getting rid of the asbestos came back for $9,835, but that's only for the part of the building that inspectors could access. Based on that and quotes from other companies on the rest of the work, Highway Surveyor Scott Crisafulli said partial demolition could cost the town $160,000. If officials want to take down more, the town is going to have to figure out how to get a more complete estimate.

CRUCIAL QUOTE: "As soon as I get the OK from the finance director, we should be able to move forward," Crisafulli said.

TANGENT: This isn't the only worrisome property in town. Milford is trying to get a handle on a backlog of more than 100 foreclosed or soon-to-be foreclosed properties in town, many of which are vacant. For a couple dozen properties, the town isn't even sure who owns them. Read about that here.

Read more:
Cost estimates come in for demolition of blighted Milford warehouse - Milford Daily News

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WKBW) The vacant Shoreline Apartments now have a set demolition date, January 23.

Mayor Byron Brown announced the plans Wednesday afternoon. It's been a long time coming for this project. 7 Eyewitness News checked in on the development over the summer , learning that the hold up was a result of an ongoing lawsuit.

In December , things looked optimistic for the project moving forward.

Early January, owners at Norstar Development told 7 Eyewitness News the buildings were set to be torn down in January of 2020. Members of the community complained about the eyesore that leads you to Downtown Buffalo.

"We know we're a gateway and we want to do our part, have this really welcoming and very nice aesthetic to the housing that's going to be here and the people that are going to live here so they can be really proud of their homes," said Norstar's Senior Vice President Linda Goodman.

There is now construction tape and heavy machinery in what's left of the Shoreline Apartments as they're finally being torn down this week. The $34 million-dollar plan is to replace them with new, subsidized housing, to match the apartments further down Niagara Street, per developers.

"It's going to work very nicely for affordable and middle income right in the downtown core when we're losing a lot of affordable housing," said Goodman.

Those who were evicted from the apartments in three years ago will now have the opportunity to apply to move back in when the project is finished.

Buffalo Police have gone in to make sure no one is living in the apartments, as there had been reports of squatters. There's red tape lining the apartments warning of asbestos, but city officials say that is nothing to worry about.

Developers expect the project to take a few months, the goal is to be done by Memorial Day of 2020. The entire re-development project could take up to two years to complete.

Go here to see the original:
Local News Demolition of Shoreline Apartments will begin Jan. 23 Taylor Epps 7:36 PM, Jan - WKBW-TV

PARAMUS, NJ An architect retained by the manager of a historic borough home one of Paramus last ties to black history told the Planning Board Thursday evening that the dilapidated Jersey Dutch house, which dates back to the mid-19th Century, could not be easily restored to its true glory.

For the past month, the planning board has been hearing a request by applicant, 113-117 West Midland Avenue LLC, for a demolition permit concerning the site of the 170-year-old Van Dien-Ruffgarten House, located at 117 West Midland Avenue which sits in a Historic Preservation Zone in the borough.

On Thursday, the board heard testimony from Charles Baldanza, an architect with Baldanza Build + Design and a Paramus resident of more than two decades, on his two-hour stay at the home, providing a thorough investigation of its status. Baldanza was retained by Bill Twomey, the applicants manager, to investigate.

Our newsletter delivers the local news that you can trust.

I strongly disagree with the conclusion that this house is intact and can be easily restored to its true glory, said Baldanza to the board.

Looking at the western end of the home at the oldest portion of the building at a structure entitled the mud house, Baldanza said the wall, which is 11 feet from Midland Avenue, is in imminent danger of collapse. He said the stone rubble is covered with a strapping that was put in place by a contractor that Twomey hired in response to a complaint he received from the boroughs quality of life officer.

When this house was built back in the 1840s, Midland Avenue, if it existed at all, was a little country lane or a carriage way, said Baldanza to the board. Now, unfortunately, Midland Avenue has become a major thoroughfare to county roads and I feel that the vibration from the traffic is the major cause that has led to the deterioration of this wall. The wall is bulging significantly outward. It is structurally unsound. Pedestrians pass by every day down the sidewalk and I think its a safety concern.

Baldanza explained that attempting to repair and restore such Jersey Dutch houses would be difficult considering that the home was made with low-grade materials and that bolstering the repair with steel would bastardize the historical integrity and yield more of replica of the original home than a restoration to its former state.If youre looking at a structure and youre saying is it worth preserving or does it have historical value, you have to look at how much is still left, Baldanza said, pointing to stucco that was added in the early 20th Century and the asphalt shingle roof.

This house is in very rough shape. Theres the beaverboard, the plaster, everything is just cracking and falling down, he said. It would take a lot to restore it to any kind of usable condition.

A historian will appear at the planning boards March 5 meeting to provide rebuttal testimony on the homes historic credentials, Planning Board Chairman Peter Caminiti Sr., said.

Read more from the original source:
Hearing On Demolition Permit For Historic Home Tied To Black History In Paramus Is Carried To March 5 - TAPinto.net

Crews continue work on what is considered one of the most difficult elements of the $341 million Interstate 35 project the demolition and replacement of bridges over the Brazos River.

Workers with Webber LLC started hammering away the decking from the southbound bridge last Friday and soon will be cutting away the metal beams underneath, said Clayton Zacha, Waco area engineer for the Texas Department of Transportation.

The delicate work over the Brazos River is part of what could be a four-year project to rebuild and expand Interstate 35 from 12th Street north to Loop 340.

Waco residents and local businesses already are growing weary from the inconveniences and delays from the massive highway project, but officials promise they are doing everything they can to minimize the pain.

Any time you work over water, it presents unique challenges for sure, Zacha said. Overall, it typically causes slower production and workflow because of environmental protections that have to be in place, plus access obviously is completely different from working over dry land.

Crews are using large barges under the bridge to catch falling debris to prevent it from getting into the waterway.

While this weeks rains have slowed the pace of the work a bit, it has helped workers minimize and control dust from the debris. But the rain also has quickened the pace of the water flow, Zacha said.

Without the rain, crews keep the work area watered to control dust debris, he said. But there are other measures that must be taken, such as fences or filters, to prevent debris that gets into the waterway from flowing downstream, Zacha said.

Before the southbound bridge demolition started, workers removed lead paint from the pair of main-lane bridges, causing closures along parts of the east and west riverwalks. Signs are out warning that the riverwalks remain closed, but TxDOT and city parks officials will work together to open them for special events, Waco parks director Jonathan Cook said.

No-wake boating also is still allowed under the bridges, Cook said.

Interstate traffic is being diverted to the northbound bridge during this phase of the project, TxDOT spokesman Ken Roberts said. After that, traffic will be shifted to the new southbound lanes while the northbound bridge over the river is taken down and rebuilt.

The river bridge projects should take about two years, officials said.

All signs at this time point to everything proceeding like we would like it to, Zacha said.

He said it is normally easier to remove a structure over water than to build one. However, when you introduce a waterway into the equation, both operations become a little more complicated.

Particularly when you have equipment on the water that you are using to do both, Roberts added. When equipment is on the water, there are a considerable number of safety concerns that have to be addressed at all times.

After the deck is removed with jackhammers, crews will cut the metal beams in pieces and remove the parts with a crane.

Link:
Brazos River bridge demolition among most complex parts of I-35 overhaul - Waco Tribune-Herald

If you hear a loud boom and a cloud of dust, dont panic. An11-story tower will be imploded next month to make way for a new development.

The former Affiliated Computer Services building at 2828 N. Haskell Ave. is slated for demolition Feb. 16 at daybreak.

Traffic will be stopped on Interstate 75 approximately 10 minutes before the implosion. Pedestrians and vehicles will have limited access to the area for several hours before and after.

The demolition is expected to last no more than five minutes. However, falling debris will produce a cloud of dust that, with wind, could travel beyond the demolition zone.

The owners and contractors are aware of the dangers of such an operation and have been working for months to create a design and plan for this implosion that is with the utmost thought to safety, the developers said in a letter to the city.

Building owner De La Vega Development is destroying the building to build a mixed-use development with offices, a hotel and retail space on the 20-acre site.

Anyone with questions can contact Scott Finnell at De La Vega Development at sfinnell@delavegadevelopment.com or 214-750-7688 ext. 209.

See the rest here:
This East Dallas tower slated for demolition is your chance to (safely) see an explosion - Advocate Media

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. A recent contract for demolition work at the Morgantown Municipal Airport comes with a refreshing difference- the contractor, Dilliner, Pennsylvania-based Safeco Environmental, Inc, will pay $500 for the opportunity to do the work.

Airport director Jon Vrabel says the T-hangar structures are part of the original airport configuration.

The old T-hangars are about 80 years-old. theyre no longer being used,Vrabel said,A couple years ago we built a new T-hangar facility on the property, on the east side of the property, opposite of the terminal building.

Vrabel says the buildings are in disrepair and have a plethora problems making it cost prohibitive to remodel, but in this case thats a good thing.

The buildings are all steel and the steel is very high quality due to the age,Vrabel said,When you look at reusing that steel, it has a value. So, were actually being paid to take the buildings down because of the value of the steel.

Read more from the original source:
'Recycling pays' on Morgantown demolition project | 104.5 FM & 1440 AM | The Voice of Morgantown | Morgantown, WV - wajr

Advertisement

The Health & Safety Executive (HSE) is still investigating the incident that happened on August 1 last year but has revealed that part of the old shopping centre being demolished failed. This, in turn, caused the section of scaffolding on the outside of the building to collapse.

Many within the online scaffolding community came to the same conclusions shortly after the incident back in 2019 that injured three people. At the time of the incident Unite the UKs construction union called for an urgent investigation into the collapse.

According to the HSE, it was unlikely there would be any further answers revealing more on what happened at the site, for some time.

They said: HSE continues to investigate this incident with a view to determining the causes. As there were a large number of parties involved in the planning and the carrying out of the project, it is likely to be some months before conclusions can be drawn.

We cannot comment further at this time.

The staff at ScaffMag.com the leading scaffolding site for a digital generation.

Read this article:
Update on HSE investigation after Reading demolition incident - ScaffMag

Demolition work on the administration building at Grand Junction Regional Airport kicked off Jan. 6 and the project is progressing on schedule and on budget.

The work is scheduled to wrap up by March. There are no immediate plans for the space once the work is complete.

FCI Constructors, the contractor for the project, is hauling in 7,000 cubic yards of dirt for use as an elevated platform to demolish the structure and currently has roughly 4,000 cubic yards on site. The dirt will be put back into the ground to bring the area back up to grade with landscaping once the demolition is complete. The materials from the building will be recycled, including the concrete.

We are really happy with the progress that the contractor is making, airport spokesman Joe Burtard said.

The Grand Junction Regional Airport Authority Board of Directors voted in September 2019 to demolish the semi-finished structure east of the terminal building. The project will cost a total of $750,000. Prior to the vote, the staff had told the board that it would likely cost upward of $9 million to finish the building and that it had no immediate use for the space.

Construction began on the building in October 2013 and it was planned to house airport administration staff, who now reside on the newly renovated third floor of the terminal.

After an FBI raid in November 2013, the airport rescinded its application for a Federal Aviation Administration grant. Construction halted in 2014 and the building remained in its semi-complete since that time.

Originally posted here:
Airport administration building demolition in progress - The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel