Temples Under Construction Scheduled for Dedication Paris France Temple | Sunday, May 21, 2017 Construction Status: Interior work underway; open house and dedication dates announced Completion: Scheduled to be dedicated on Sunday, May 21, 2017 Latest Submitted Photograph: 2016 Under Construction Meridian Idaho Temple Construction Status: Installing interior and exterior light fixtures; interior work and landscaping progressing Completion: Estimated in late 2017 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: November 22, 2016 Cedar City Utah Temple Construction Status: Installing sprinkler systems and planting trees and bushes; installing window frames and art glass Completion: Estimated in late 2017 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: November 20, 2016 Tucson Arizona Temple Construction Status: Pouring concrete parking lot; adding landscaping structures Completion: Estimated in late 2017 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: November 21, 2016 Rome Italy Temple Construction Status: Interior work progressing Completion: Estimated in 2018 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: October 8, 2016 Concepcin Chile Temple Construction Status: Cupola assembly attached to steeple framework; paving main entrance Completion: Estimated in 2018 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: November 21, 2016 Kinshasa Democratic Republic of the Congo Temple Construction Status: Building the exterior walls Completion: Estimated in 2018 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: November 11, 2016 Durban South Africa Temple Construction Status: Pouring the foundations; connecting to city utilities; installing sewage lines; landscaping entrance mounds Completion: Estimated in 2018 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: Mid-November 2016 Barranquilla Colombia Temple Construction Status: Exterior walls rising Completion: Estimated in 20182019 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: November 7, 2016 Fortaleza Brazil Temple Construction Status: Erecting structural framing Completion: Estimated in 2019 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: October 18, 2016 Lisbon Portugal Temple Construction Status: Temple site cleared; preparing to pour meetinghouse footings Completion: Estimated in 2019 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: November 15, 2016 Scheduled for Groundbreaking Winnipeg Manitoba Temple Construction Status: Plans approved September 12, 2016 Completion: Groundbreaking scheduled for Saturday, December 3, 2016 at 12:00 noon Latest Submitted Photograph Temples Undergoing Renovation Scheduled for Rededication Idaho Falls Idaho Temple Construction Status: 8th operating temple; closed for renovation; finish work underway Completion: Scheduled to be rededicated on Sunday, June 4, 2017 Latest Submitted Photograph: November 13, 2016 Undergoing Renovation Jordan River Utah Temple Construction Status: 20th operating temple; closed for renovation Completion: Estimated in late 2017 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: September 28, 2016 Frankfurt Germany Temple Construction Status: 41st operating temple; closed for renovation Completion: Estimated in 2018 (no official dates announced) Latest Submitted Photograph: August 2016 Announced Temples October 2010 General Conference Urdaneta Philippines Temple Construction Status: Planning and approval phase; awaiting official site announcement Groundbreaking: Not announced Latest Submitted Photograph: September 2014 October 2012 General Conference Arequipa Peru Temple Construction Status: General contractor selected Groundbreaking: Not announced Latest Submitted Photograph: June 29, 2016 April 2013 General Conference Rio de Janeiro Brazil Temple Construction Status: Construction preparation phase; plans approved by local government Groundbreaking: Not announced Latest Submitted Photograph: November 14, 2015 April 2015 General Conference Abidjan Ivory Coast Temple Construction Status: Planning phase; awaiting official site announcement Groundbreaking: Not announced Latest Submitted Photograph: 2012 Port-au-Prince Haiti Temple Construction Status: Planning and approval phase; awaiting official site announcement Groundbreaking: Not announced Latest Submitted Photograph Bangkok Thailand Temple Construction Status: Planning and approval phase; awaiting official site announcement Groundbreaking: Not announced Latest Submitted Photograph: May 2015 April 2016 General Conference Quito Ecuador Temple Construction Status: Planning phase; awaiting official site announcement Groundbreaking: Not announced Latest Submitted Photograph Harare Zimbabwe Temple Construction Status: Planning phase; awaiting official site announcement Groundbreaking: Not announced Latest Submitted Photograph Belm Brazil Temple Construction Status: Planning phase; awaiting official site announcement Groundbreaking: Not announced Latest Submitted Photograph Lima Peru Los Olivos Temple Construction Status: Planning phase; awaiting official site announcement Groundbreaking: Not announced Latest Submitted Photograph

See the original post:
LDS (Mormon) Temple Status of Construction

NEW & REVISED Prepared to Build Church Building Guide

Now available in paperback and as an eBook in PDF format, Preparing to Build is a practical church building guide to help your church become prepared for a church building program. From concept to completion, your church will not undertake a more demanding or complicated task in terms of money, risk, and effort than it []

Comments Off on NEW & REVISED Prepared to Build Church Building Guide Read this post

Excerpted from Understanding the Needs and Feasibility Process Slide Presentation: The benefits of a Needs and Feasibility Study for any church contemplating a building program are multi-faceted. Here are some of the benefits as noted in the church needs and feasibility presentation on our website. Higher Level of Satisfaction: Quoting from the 2005 Rainer Group []

Comments Off on Benefits of a Needs & Feasibility Study Read this post

Executing a church capital campaign is part science and part art. Some of the techniques that worked well in times past are not as effective today. There have been, and will continue to be, refinements and adaptation in the process of capital fundraising. Part of the art of the campaign is adapting those processes (the science) to a churchs culture, circumstances, needs, and time line.

Comments Off on 8 Foundational Truths of Church Capital Campaigns Read this post

As a volunteer church building consultant for the Congregational Services Group of the NC Baptist Convention, I recently delivered a live webinar on the topic of conduction a church needs and feasibility studies as one of the first steps in a church building program. You may listen to, and view, this presentation online as it []

Comments Off on Needs & Feasibility Presentation Recorded Webinar Now Online Read this post

Many churches in the past year have postponed building programs due to economic uncertainty. Even though building may be 1, 2 or even 3 years away, the wise church will be preparing now for a future building program. One of the keys to becoming financially prepared to build is to execute a capital campaign well []

2 Comments Read this post

A church capital campaign is not unlike the Christmas play you begin to prepare months in advance to have the best and least stressful outcome. The right time to be in front of your congregation for a fall capital campaign is after school is back in session and before the holidays. This provides a []

Comments Off on Time is Running Out for a Fall Church Capital Campaign Read this post

See the original post here:
Church Building Consultants & Capital Campaign Consultants

Temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are buildings dedicated to be a House of the Lord, and they are considered by church members to be the most sacred structures on earth. Upon completion, temples are usually open to the public for a short period of time (an "Open House"). During the Open House, the church conducts tours of the temple with missionaries and members from the local area serving as tour guides, and all rooms of the temple are open to the public. The temple is then dedicated as a "House of the Lord," after which only members in good standing are permitted entrance; temples are not churches but are places of worship. There are 154 operating temples (which includes 3 previously dedicated, but closed for renovation), 12 under construction, and 11 announced (not yet under construction).

In 1832, shortly after the formation of the church, Joseph Smith said that the Lord desired the saints build a temple;[1] and they completed the Kirtland Temple in 1836. Initially, the church constructed temples in areas where there were large concentrations of members: Utah, Idaho, Arizona, Hawaii (all in the USA), and Alberta (Canada). In the mid 20th century, because of the importance of temples in the theology, the church tried to balance density with the travel requirements attending the temple imposed upon members. Thus, temples were built in Europe (namely, Switzerland dedicated in 1955 and England dedicated in 1958); the Pacific Islands (namely, New Zealand dedicated in 1958); and Washington, D.C.(dedicated in 1974, the first American temple East of Utah since Nauvoo in 1846). All were dedicated at a time when membership in the region alone might not have justified the effort.

In the 1980s, Spencer W. Kimball directed the church to build smaller temples with similar designs[2] allowing temples to be built where there were fewer members. As a result, the first temples in South America (Brazil dedicated in 1978); Asia (Japan dedicated in 1980); and Central America (Mexico City dedicated in 1983) were built and the number of temples doubled from 15 to 36.

Church president Gordon B. Hinckley (19102008) also accelerated the construction of temples through the use of an even smaller standardized base design.[3] In 1998, when there were 51 temples, Hinckley set a goal to have 100 temples in place before the end of 2000.[4] Between the brief building period from 1998 to 2001, 38 of these standardized temples were constructed and dedicated, meeting Hinckley's goal by having 102 dedicated temples before 2000 closed. During Hinckley's service as president, the number of temples more than doubled from 47 to 124.[5]

Note: Numbering of temples announced or under construction is tentative (which is indicated by placing the numbers in italics) and based upon the groundbreaking date, or the date of announcement if no groundbreaking has taken place. Permanent numbering may change depending upon the date of dedication.

The following is a list of temples that had been announced and in some stage of development, but whose construction is no longer being pursued.

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Kirtland 27 December 1832 27 March 1836by Joseph Smith 413731N 812144W / 41.62528N 81.36222W / 41.62528; -81.36222 (Kirtland Temple) 15,000sqft (1,400m2) Federal Georgian and New England Colonial Owned and operated by Community of Christ

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Nauvoo, Illinois, US August 1840 1 May 1846by Orson Hyde 40331.216800N 91232.972399W / 40.55033800000N 91.38415899972W / 40.55033800000; -91.38415899972 (Nauvoo Temple) 54,000sqft (5,000m2) Greek revival- designed by William Weeks Some sources claim a private dedication on 30 April 1846 by Brigham Young.[6] Abandoned in 1846, destroyed by fire on 19 November 1848, rebuilt in 2002 (see 113)

Location: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Notes:

Salt Lake City, Utah, USA 5 May 1855by Heber C. Kimball 2 October 1856 (baptistry only) 404616N 1115337W / 40.77111N 111.89361W / 40.77111; -111.89361 (Endowment House) The Endowment House was not dedicated as a temple and was not considered a temple, but rather was used to perform certain temple functions until it was ordered dismantled in 1889.

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Apia 2 July 1980 5 August 1983by Gordon B. Hinckley 135018.03839S 171470.909600W / 13.8383439972S 171.78358600000W / -13.8383439972; -171.78358600000 (Apia Samoa Temple original) 14,560sqft (1,353m2) and 78ft (24m)high on a 2acre (0.8ha) site Classic Modern, single spire- designed by Emil B. Fetzer Destroyed by fire during renovations on 9 July 2003. Rebuilt temple was dedicated 4 September 2005 (see 22)[7]

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

St. George, Utah, US 31 January 1871 6 April 1877by Daniel H. Wells 11 November 1975by Spencer W. Kimball 3761.450800N 1133441.17439W / 37.10040300000N 113.5781039972W / 37.10040300000; -113.5781039972 (St. George Utah Temple) 110,000sqft (10,000m2) and 175ft (53m)high on a 6acre (2.4ha) site Castellated Gothic- designed by Truman O. Angell A private dedication was held on January 1, 1877 by Erastus Snow. The original tower of 147 feet was disliked by Brigham Young and was struck by lightning and burned to its base after Young's death. It was rebuilt according to Young's original design with a 175 ft (53 m) tower.

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style:

Logan, Utah, US 1863 17 May 1884by John Taylor 13 March 1979by Spencer W. Kimball 41442.979600N 1114940.59480W / 41.73416100000N 111.8279430000W / 41.73416100000; -111.8279430000 (Logan Utah Temple) 119,619sqft (11,113m2) and 170ft (52m)high on a 9acre (3.6ha) site Castellated- designed by Truman O. Angell

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Manti, Utah, US 25 June 1875 21 May 1888by Lorenzo Snow 14 June 1985by Gordon B. Hinckley 391622.46159N 111381.535999W / 39.2729059972N 111.63375999972W / 39.2729059972; -111.63375999972 (Manti Utah Temple) 100,373sqft (9,325m2) and 179ft (55m)high on a 27acre (10.9ha) site Castellated Gothic/French Renaissance- designed by William H. Folsom Wilford Woodruff performed a private dedication on May 17, 1888.[8]

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Salt Lake City, Utah, US 28 July 1847 6 April 1893by Wilford Woodruff 404613.68480N 1115331.04880W / 40.7704680000N 111.8919580000W / 40.7704680000; -111.8919580000 (Salt Lake Temple) 253,015sqft (23,506m2) and 222ft (68m)high on a 10acre (4ha) site Gothic, 6 spire- designed by Truman O. Angell The Salt Lake temple was dedicated in 31 sessions held between 6 and 24 April 1893.

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Laie, Hawaii, US 1 October 1915 27 November 1919by Heber J. Grant 20 November 2010[11]by Thomas S. Monson 213849.6N 1575550.1W / 21.647111N 157.930583W / 21.647111; -157.930583 (Laie Hawaii Temple) 47,224sqft (4,387m2) on a 11.4acre (4.6ha) site Solomon's Temple, no spire- designed by Hyrum Pope and Harold Burton Thomas S. Monson rededicated the Laie Hawaii Temple on 20 November 2010[9] following nearly 2 years of renovations that began 29 December 2008.[10] The remodel completed in 1978 expanded the temple from 10,500 square feet (980m2) to over 47,000 square feet (4,400m2).

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Cardston, Alberta, Canada 27 June 1913 26 August 1923by Heber J. Grant 22 June 1991by Gordon B. Hinckley 491152.23840N 1131832.50800W / 49.1978440000N 113.3090300000W / 49.1978440000; -113.3090300000 (Cardston Alberta Temple) 81,700sqft (7,590m2) and 85ft (26m)high on a 10acre (4ha) site Solomons Temple, no spire- designed by Hyrum Pope and Harold Burton An addition was completed in 1962 and was dedicated on 2 July 1962 by Hugh B. Brown.

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Mesa, Arizona, United States 3 October 1919 23 October 1927by Heber J. Grant 16 April 1975by Spencer W. Kimball 332446.4N 1114910.5W / 33.412889N 111.819583W / 33.412889; -111.819583 (Mesa Arizona Temple) 120,000sqft (11,000m2) and 50ft (15m)high on a 20acre (8.1ha) site Neoclassical Architecture- designed by Don Carlos Young, Jr. and Ramm Hansen The first temple to offer ordinances in a language other than English (Spanish).

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style:

Idaho Falls, Idaho, US 3 March 1937 23 September 1945by George Albert Smith Scheduled for 3 June 2017 432959.34840N 112229.39999W / 43.4998190000N 112.0414999972W / 43.4998190000; -112.0414999972 (Idaho Falls Idaho Temple) 92,177sqft (8,564m2) and 143ft (44m)high on a 7acre (2.8ha) site Modern, center spire- designed by John Fetzer, Sr.

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Mnchenbuchsee, Switzerland 1 July 1952 11 September 1955by David O. McKay 23 November 1992by Gordon B. Hinckley 4707.891200N 72729.67839E / 47.00219200000N 7.4582439972E / 47.00219200000; 7.4582439972 (Bern Switzerland Temple) 39,063sqft (3,629m2) and 140ft (43m)high on a 7acre (2.8ha) site Modern, single spire- designed by Edward O. Anderson Bern was the first temple to present the endowment using a movie, necessitated by the multiple languages required to support the members in Europe.

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size: Style:

Los Angeles, California, US 6 March 1937 11 March 1956by David O. McKay 34310.1N 118262.1W / 34.052806N 118.433917W / 34.052806; -118.433917 (Los Angeles California Temple) 190,614sqft (17,709m2) and 257ft (78m)high on a 13acre (5.3ha) site Modern, single-tower design- designed by Edward O. Anderson

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size: Style:

Hamilton, New Zealand 17 February 1955 20 April 1958by David O. McKay 374934.62599S 1751328.64280E / 37.8262849972S 175.2246230000E / -37.8262849972; 175.2246230000 (Hamilton New Zealand Temple) 44,212sqft (4,107m2) and 157ft (48m)high on a 86acre (35ha) site Modern contemporary, single spire- designed by Edward O. Anderson

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style:

Lingfield, Surrey, United Kingdom 17 February 1955 7 September 1958by David O. McKay 18 October 1992by Gordon B. Hinckley 51945.23759N 037.851599W / 51.1625659972N 0.05218099972W / 51.1625659972; -0.05218099972 (London England Temple) 42,775sqft (3,974m2) and 190ft (58m)high on a 32acre (12.9ha) site Modern contemporary, single spire- designed by Edward O. Anderson

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size: Style:

Oakland, California, US 26 May 1962 17 November 1964by David O. McKay 374828.0N 1221157.1W / 37.807778N 122.199194W / 37.807778; -122.199194 (Oakland California Temple) 95,000sqft (8,800m2) and 170ft (52m)high on a 18.3acre (7.4ha) site Modern, five-spire design with Oriental motif- designed by Harold W. Burton

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Ogden, Utah, US 24 August 1967 18 January 1972by Joseph Fielding Smith 21 September 2014by Thomas S. Monson 411339.06840N 1115817.04360W / 41.2275190000N 111.9714010000W / 41.2275190000; -111.9714010000 (Ogden Utah Temple) 115,000sqft (10,700m2) and 180ft (55m)high on a 18.3acre (7.4ha) site Modern, single-tower design- designed by Emil B. Fetzer The temple was closed for 3 1/2 years to undergo renovations that significantly modified the look of the building.[12][13] Following an open house from August 1 to September 6, 2014, the temple was rededicated on September 21, 2014.[14][15]

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Provo, Utah, US 14 August 1967 9 February 1972by Joseph Fielding Smith 401549.19760N 1113823.20440W / 40.2636660000N 111.6397790000W / 40.2636660000; -111.6397790000 (Provo Utah Temple) 128,325sqft (11,922m2) and 175ft (53m)high on a 17acre (6.9ha) site Functional modern with single center spire design- designed by Emil B. Fetzer Harold B. Lee read the dedicatory prayer prepared by Joseph Fielding Smith

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size:

Kensington, Maryland, US 15 November 1968 19 November 1974by Spencer W. Kimball 39050.68440N 77356.24639W / 39.0140790000N 77.0656239972W / 39.0140790000; -77.0656239972 (Washington D.C. Temple) 160,000sqft (15,000m2) and 288ft (88m)high on a 52acre (21ha) site

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style:

So Paulo, So Paulo, Brazil 1 March 1975 30 October 1978by Spencer W. Kimball 22 February 2004by Gordon B. Hinckley 23356.626399S 464321.95039W / 23.58517399972S 46.7227639972W / -23.58517399972; -46.7227639972 (So Paulo Brazil Temple) 59,246sqft (5,504m2) on a 1.85acre (0.7ha) site Spanish influenced modern, single-spire design- designed by Emil B. Fetzer

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size: Style:

Tokyo, Japan 9 August 1975 27 October 1980by Spencer W. Kimball 353910.21680N 1394328.34039E / 35.6528380000N 139.7245389972E / 35.6528380000; 139.7245389972 (Tokyo Japan Temple) 52,590sqft (4,886m2) and 178ft (54m)high on a 0.46acre (0.2ha) site Modern, one spire- designed by Emil B. Fetzer

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size:

Bellevue, Washington, US 27 May 1978 17 November 1980by Spencer W. Kimball 47352.651999N 122827.15360W / 47.58406999972N 122.1408760000W / 47.58406999972; -122.1408760000 (Seattle Washington Temple) 110,000sqft (10,000m2) and 179ft (55m)high on a 23.5acre (9.5ha) site

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size:

South Jordan, Utah, US 3 February 1978 16 November 1981by Marion G. Romney 403358.08600N 1115553.51520W / 40.5661350000N 111.9315320000W / 40.5661350000; -111.9315320000 (Jordan River Utah Temple) 148,236sqft (13,772m2) and 219ft (67m)high on a 15acre (6.1ha) site

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Notes:

Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States 2 April 1980 1 June 1983by Gordon B. Hinckley 1 May 2011by Thomas S. Monson 335554.24239N 842144.77319W / 33.9317339972N 84.3624369972W / 33.9317339972; -84.3624369972 (Atlanta Georgia Temple) 37,000sqft (3,400m2) and 92ft (28m)high on a 13.33acre (5.4ha) site The rededication in 1997 was for the addition of a new baptistry, two new sealing rooms, and remodeling. In April 2009, the church announced that the Atlanta Temple would close on 1 July for 15 to 18 months for renovations[16] The temple was rededicated by Thomas S. Monson on May 1, 2011[17]

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Notes:

Apia, Samoa 16 July 2003 Original temple dedicated5 August 1983by Gordon B. Hinckley,rebuilt temple dedicated 4 September 2005by Gordon B. Hinckley 4 September 2005by Gordon B. Hinckley 135018.03839S 171470.909600W / 13.8383439972S 171.78358600000W / -13.8383439972; -171.78358600000 (Apia Samoa Temple) 18,691sqft (1,736m2) and 75ft (23m)high on a 2acre (0.8ha) site The original Samoa temple was dedicated in 1983 and destroyed by fire while the temple was closed for renovations in 2003. This new temple of a similar design was built on the same site although it is substantially larger.[7] The LDS Church continues to list this as the 22nd operating temple, in accordance to its original dedication date.[18]

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Notes:

Tongatapu, Tonga 2 April 1980 9 August 1983by Gordon B. Hinckley 4 November 2007by Russell M. Nelson 21945.21960S 1751620.35200W / 21.1625610000S 175.2723200000W / -21.1625610000; -175.2723200000 (Nuku'alofa Tonga Temple) 14,572sqft (1,354m2) on a 5acre (2ha) site The Tongan temple was rededicated 4 November 2007 following remodeling that began in June 2006.[19][20]

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size:

Santiago, Chile 2 April 1980 15 September 1983by Gordon B. Hinckley 12 March 2006by Gordon B. Hinckley 332610.22640S 703634.27560W / 33.4361740000S 70.6095210000W / -33.4361740000; -70.6095210000 (Santiago Chile Temple) 20,831sqft (1,935m2) and 76ft (23m)high on a 2.61acre (1.1ha) site

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style:

Papeete, French Polynesia 2 April 1980 27 October 1983by Gordon B. Hinckley 12 November 2006by L. Tom Perry 173211.82480S 1493321.66839W / 17.5366180000S 149.5560189972W / -17.5366180000; -149.5560189972 (Papeete Tahiti Temple) 12,150sqft (1,129m2) and 66ft (20m)high on a 1.7acre (0.7ha) site Modern, single-spire design with influences of French and Polynesian cultures- designed by Emil B. Fetzer

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Mexico City, DF, Mexico 3 April 1976 2 December 1983by Gordon B. Hinckley 16 November 2008[26]by Thomas S. Monson 192757.25799N 99512.31439W / 19.4659049972N 99.0867539972W / 19.4659049972; -99.0867539972 (Mexico City Mexico Temple) 116,642sqft (10,836m2) and 152ft (46m)high on a 7acre (2.8ha) site Modern adaptation of ancient Mayan architecture- designed by Emil B. Fetzer The Mexico City Mexico Temple was closed March 30, 2007 for renovations[21][22] and was rededicated Sunday, 16 November 2008.[23] The temple was again closed in early 2014 for renovations.[22] A public open house was held from Friday, 14 August 2015, through Saturday, 5 September 2015, excluding Sundays.[24] The temple was rededicated on Sunday, September 13, 2015.[25]

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Rededication: Coordinates: Size: Style: Notes:

Boise, Idaho, US 31 March 1982 25 May 1984by Gordon B. Hinckley 18 November 2012by Thomas S. Monson 433536.68279N 1161630.12240W / 43.5935229972N 116.2750340000W / 43.5935229972; -116.2750340000 (Boise Idaho Temple) 35,868sqft (3,332m2) and 112ft (34m)high on a 4.83acre (2ha) site Modern adaptation of six-spire design- designed by Church A&E Services The rededication in 1987 was for an addition only. The Boise Idaho Temple was closed for additional renovations in July 2011 and rededicated in November 2012.[27]

Location: Announcement: Dedication: Coordinates: Size: Style:

See the article here:
List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter ...

206 N Fourth Street Pleasantville, New Jersey Property can accommodate 85+/- parishioners. Property contains a small private office, Kitchen area, and large open area, and separate restrooms...

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $175,000 2,500 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $1,350,000 22,600 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $470,000 4,600 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Video

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active Not Disclosed 7,200 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $274,900 1,656 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $329,900 1,846 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $599,000 3,000 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $650,000 5,600 SF N/A Office Office Building

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active Not Disclosed 35,000 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $875,000 11,720 SF N/A Office Office Building

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active Not Disclosed 20,000 SF 8.00% Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active Not Disclosed 17,000 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $630,000 - $8,491,000 1,277 - 21,260 SF N/A Office Office Condo

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $3,200,000 20,000 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $899,000 10,000 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $229,000 3,000 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $750,000 5,565 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $350,000 5,500 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $1,150,000 4,300 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $2,800,000 20,000 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $1,395,000 8,700 SF N/A Office Office Building

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $1,750,000 31,225 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $799,000 10,000 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $650,000 19,000 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Status: Price: Bldg. Size: Cap Rate: Primary Type: Sub-Type:

Active $888,888 3,000 SF N/A Special Purpose Religious Facility

Share this page on social networks:

Start a new search to find more New Jersey Churches for sale or lease:

Do you have a New Jersey Church listing available for sale? You can list it for FREE: Click to add your property to LoopNet.com.

LoopNet.com operates the most heavily trafficked online listing service for New Jersey Church commercial real estate and other U.S. and Canadian markets with over $425 billion of commercial real estate for sale and 6.3 billion of commercial real estate space for lease. LoopNet also attracts a large community of New Jersey commercial real estate professionals with more than 7 million total members comprised of brokers, corporate executives, appraisers, and more than 3 million buyers, tenants and other principals throughout the U.S. and Canada, many of whom specialize in New Jersey Churches properties for sale or lease.

Go to LoopNet.com to find or advertise New Jersey Church commercial real estate.

Register for FREE and get Access to the More LoopNet New Jersey Properties

Back to view all New Jersey Commercial Real Estate for Sale and Lease

Find Commercial Real Estate by ZIP Code

Go here to read the rest:
New Jersey Churches For Sale on LoopNet.com

Need a New Church Building? View our entire collection of Church Designs.

Whether youre looking to build a brand new house of worship, or your church is in need of expansion youre going to need an experienced contractor you can count on.

Weve completed more than 40 church projects over the last decade with fantastic results.

If you are considering expansion work or new construction for your church property, call us at (FL) 813-750-1222 or visit our dedicated Church Building websiteChurch Builders Southeast for more information on our church construction services.

Canco General Contractors have successfully managed the construction and expansion of more than thirty churches and worship centers of all shapes and sizes throughout the southeast United States.

Our clients are as important to us today as they were when we first started, back in 1986.

Interior of St. Johns Episcopal Church

In fact, four out of five clients come back to us for their next construction project. Many come back again, and again and some have hired us to manage the completion of 10 or moreprojects because we treat each job as if it were the first.

Take a look at our work It speaks for itself!

Read more from the original source:
Church Construction and Steel Church Buildings | Canco

American Dream Meadowlands Location Meadowlands Sports Complex, East Rutherford, New Jersey Opening date Unknown Owner Triple Five Group Architect The Rockwell Group No. of stores and services 500+[1] No. of anchor tenants 6 Total retail floor area 4,800,000sqft (450,000m2) No. of floors 5 Parking 30,000+ spaces (11,450 walkup, 20,000 overflow, 3 parking garages) Website http://www.americandream.com

American Dream Meadowlands (ADM) is a stalled retail and entertainment complex under construction in the Meadowlands Sports Complex in East Rutherford, New Jersey. It was first proposed in 2003 by the Mills Corporation as the Meadowlands Xanadu. After the bankruptcy of that company in 2007, the project was taken over by Colony Capital. In May 2009, construction stalled due to the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers. The Triple Five Group announced intent to take over the mall in May 2011, and on July 31, 2013, officially gained control of the mall and the surounding site.[2]

After a series of hand-offs, financing issues, construction delays, and legal challenges, the mall is currently anticipated to open in mid-2018.[3] The mall is expected to have about 450 stores and a wide variety of entertainment, including multiple indoor theme parks.

The project started in July 2002 with a request for proposal issued by the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority for a project to be built adjacent to the (then-named) Continental Airlines Arena.[4] In February 2003, the authority's board chose a joint venture between the former Mills Corporation and the Mack-Cali realty corporation, in partnership with the Sports Complex's owner, the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority. The project was selected over alternatives proposed by Westfield and Hartz Mountain Industries.[4]

The project was billed by Mills chairman and executive officer Laurence E. Siegel as "...a new standard for bringing lifestyle, recreation, sports and family entertainment offerings together in one location."[5] Ground was broken on the complex on September 29, 2004,[6] and, at the time, was expected to open two years later.[7]

In November 2006, Colony Capital took control of the project from Mills Corp and pushed the projected opening to 2008.[4]

In May 2009, construction on Xanadu, which was nearly 80% complete[8] (and whose common areas were about 88% complete), came to a halt after a subsidiary of bankrupt Lehman Brothers missed payments, causing other lenders to withdraw from the project, and lost $500million worth of construction funding. While developers stated the mall was 70% leased,[9] it is unknown how many retailers stayed leased while the mall was delayed. In August 2009, Cabela's, a major anchor, announced that it did not plan to open its Meadowlands location until late 2010.[10] Around the same time, the complex's website was relaunched with the new Xanadu Meadowlands name.

In 2010, Stephen Ross, owner of The Related Companies in Manhattan, stated that he could finish the project by the end of 2010, possibly with a new name and look.[11] In May 2010, the NJSEA handed the project over to the Related Companies, and the "Xanadu" name had been dropped, changing the name to "The Meadowlands".[12]

On August 10, 2010, Colony Capital surrendered control of the development of the mall to five lenders. A special governor's commission on the state's gaming and entertainment industry is filed recommendations to Governor of New Jersey. Four parties were noted to be interested in redeveloping the project.[13]The Wall Street Journal on December 24, 2010, reported that Triple Five Group signed a letter of intent to invest in and finish the stalled mall.[14] Triple Five proposed that the mall be expanded to include indoor amusement and water parks. Developers cut a deal with Deutsche Bank to provide an approximately $700 million loan to finish the project.[8]

On February 1, 2011, after a record-breaking month of snow for the area,[15] a 50 to 60-foot long section of the eastern wall had buckled and a horizontal crease was apparent on the complex's indoor ski slope. Two days later, on February 3, after workers were attempting to melt snow from the ski slope's roof, ice build-up caused the eastern wall to fail and suffer a partial collapse along an approximately 150-foot (50m) length of roof.[16] Michael Beckerman, a spokesman for the projects lending group stated, "the Lender Group is aware of the damage to the roof caused by excessive snow and ice, but does not feel the damage affects the integrity of the structure. As such, the group has filed an insurance claim, and once the weather turns warmer, it will assess the damages and fix whatever is necessary."[17]

On April 29, 2011, the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority completed a deal with Triple Five Group, which currently owns two of North America's largest mallsWest Edmonton Mall and Mall of America. Triple Five assumed ownership of the Meadowlands Mall and renamed it to "American Dream Meadowlands", with an opening date of Autumn 2013, months before Super Bowl XLVIII at MetLife Stadium, just across the highway. The deal was officially announced on May 3, 2011, and it was announced Triple Five had secured land across the highway from the mall to construct a domed theme park based on DreamWorks Animation and water park, opening in early 2014.[18][19]

The mall was delayed further by financing, permitting, and a lawsuit filed by the New York Giants and New York Jets over traffic concerns.[20] Triple Five officially took ownership of the mall on July 31, 2013, with construction set to start in late August of that year, despite the Giants and Jets' lawsuit.[2] Construction officially began in November and the developer estimated it would take approximately 24 months to complete the project.[21]

On March 13, 2014 the Triple Five Group announced a settlement was reached with the New York Giants and New York Jets allowing the long-delayed project to move forward. Construction has been ongoing since November 2013 and was expected to pick up in early 2014. Although no timetable for completion was announced, the developer originally said it would take about 24 months to complete the project once construction began.[21] That April, Triple Five released a revised design for the mall's exterior and confirmed a tentative opening date in late 2016.[22]

In December 2014, the project was scheduled to partially open by Fall of 2016.[23]

In June 2015, the New Jersey Local Finance Board approved a tax-sharing plan between East Rutherford and Triple Five. In August 2015, the New Jersey Economic Development Authority reauthorized a $390 million potential tax break for the project. These steps were intended to set the stage for a sale of up to $1 billion in government bonds to raise money to complete the project in time for its new projected completion in the second half of 2017.[4]

In April 2016, a planned bond issue fell through.[24] In July 2016, construction appeared to have stopped, the developers were trying to obtain $1 billion in additional financing, and the projected completion date had slipped again, to 2018.[25] In August 2016, the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority announced an $800 million bond issue intended to finance further construction of the mall.[26]

In September 2016, the Triple Five Group announced that a Nickelodeon Universe amusement park would fill the indoor amusement park space.[27]

The exterior of the project, which is visible from the New Jersey Turnpike and New Jersey Route 3, is a combination of aluminum composite and aluminum siding, of various colors including turquoise, red, yellow, and green. The north end of the building consists of the indoor ski slope. Most politicians and the public have equally criticized the building's appearance calling it "The ugliest building in New Jersey".[28][29] Former Acting New Jersey Governor Richard Codey was quoted in the New York Times as calling the structure "yucky-looking".[30] Although the facility has been renamed, Governor Chris Christie is on record as saying it's an offense to the eyes as you drive up the turnpike" and that Its by far the ugliest damn building in New Jersey, and maybe America.[31] The exterior will be repainted in a different color scheme as part of Triple Five's ownership.[32]

Publicity materials for the project claim that the complex, if and when opened, will contain the following features.

Announced in February 2008, the Pepsi Globe, a 287ft (87m) tall giant Ferris wheel with 26 passenger capsules, was to be constructed facing the NJ Turnpike and originally expected to open in 2009.[33][34]

From traffic concerns to environmental concerns, there are many who have opposed the idea of building a permanent shopping center within the Meadowlands Sports Complex. The project is being built on state-owned land, as the NJSEA is a state agency, and $81.3 million was spent on transportation improvements such as new off and on ramps and a train station at the Sports Complex.[30] Some have also called the mall a "colossal real estate nightmare"[42] and "perhaps the worst retail failure ever".[43]

The New York Giants had proposed that the mall be closed on days when the NFL team had home games, as part of the deal to build a New Meadowlands Stadium to replace Giants Stadium. The Giants then made an agreement with then-Xanadu to allow the complex to be open on game days, with the option to sue if traffic became a concern, an agreement which remains in effect now that the New Meadowlands Stadium will be co-owned with the New York Jets.[citation needed] The teams contend that while the mall will be closed on Sundays due to Bergen County's Blue Law, the amusement park will not, thus creating traffic jams on game days. Between 20,000 and 25,000 park at the complex on game days. Traffic studies conducted by the team estimate that 7,700 will be added by the project, while developers state that it would add only 63 more cars, as local residents would be wise enough to avoid the grounds at that time and most tourists would take the rail link to the MetLife Stadium site rather than drive.[44]

The complex was originally developed by the Mills Corporation in partnership with Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, with financing by Kan Am. In May 2006, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it was formally investigating the Mills Corporation after the company announced that it was restating four years of earnings due to executive misconduct and accounting errors. Later in the year, an analyst at Bank of America Securities pushed Mills Corporation to drop the project, citing the signs of cost overruns.[45]

The Federal Aviation Administration expressed concerns about the height of the Ferris wheel (~330ft) affecting local air traffic to and from Teterboro Airport.[46]

In February 2015, US Federal prosecutors accused Joe Ferriero, former chairman of the Bergen County Democratic Organization and New Jersey political power broker, of bribery, fraud, and racketeering charges.[47] The charges included an allegation that Mills Corporation paid Ferriero $1.7 million over the course of several years as a bribe or extortion to maintain Ferriero's political support for their development bid on the Xanadu project against rivals Hartz Mountain Industries. James Dausch, a former Mills Corporation employee testified that the $1.7 million was paid for Ferriero's consulting, not as a bribe. Dausch's testimony detailed much of the development bid process, including paid lobbyists positioning Mills with Governor Jim McGreevey, then Governor Richard Codey, as well as with Senator Robert Menendez.[48] In April 2015, Ferriero was found guilty on five counts, but not on the Mills Corporation racketeering charges.[49]

See original here:
American Dream Meadowlands - Wikipedia

A church building, often simply called a church, is a building used for Christian religious activities, particularly worship services. The term in its architectural sense is most often used by Christians to refer to their religious buildings, but it is sometimes used (by analogy) for buildings of other religions.[1] In traditional Christian architecture, the church is often arranged in the shape of a Christian cross. When viewed from plan view the longest part of a cross is represented by the aisle and the junction of the cross is located at the altar area.

Towers or domes are often added with the intention of directing the eye of the viewer towards the heavens and inspiring church visitors. Modern church buildings have a variety of architectural styles and layouts; many buildings that were designed for other purposes have now been converted for church use; and, similarly, many original church buildings have been put to other uses.

The earliest identified Christian church was a house church founded between 233 and 256. During the 11th through 14th centuries, a wave of building of cathedrals and smaller parish churches occurred across Western Europe. A cathedral is a church, usually Roman Catholic, Anglican, Oriental Orthodox or Eastern Orthodox, housing the seat of a bishop.

In Greek, the adjective kyriak-s/-/-n means "belonging, or pertaining, to a Kyrios" ("Lord"), and the usage was adopted by early Christians of the Eastern Mediterranean with regard to anything pertaining to the Lord Jesus Christ: hence "Kyriaks okos" ("house of the Lord", church), "Kyriak" ("[the day] of the Lord", i.e. Sunday), or "Kyriak proseukh" (the "Lord's Prayer").[2]

In standard Greek usage, the older word "ecclesia" (, ekklesa, literally "assembly", "congregation", or the place where such a gathering occurs) was retained to signify both a specific edifice of Christian worship (a "church"), and the overall community of the faithful (the "Church"). This usage was also retained in Latin and the languages derived from Latin (e.g. French glise, Italian chiesa, Spanish iglesia, Portuguese igreja, etc.), as well as in the Celtic languages (Welsh eglwys, Irish eaglais, Breton iliz, etc.) and in Turkish (kilise).[2]

In the Germanic and some Slavic languages, the word kyriak-s/-/-n was adopted instead and derivatives formed thereof. In Old English the sequence of derivation started as "cirice" (Ki-ri-keh), then "churche" (kerke), and eventually "church" in its current pronunciation. German Kirche, Scottish kirk, Russian (tserkov), etc., are all similarly derived.[3]

According to the New Testament, the earliest Christians did not build church buildings. Instead, they gathered in homes (Acts 17:5, 20:20, 1 Cor 16:19) or in Jewish worship places like the Second Temple or synagogues (Acts 2:46, 19:8). The earliest archeologically identified Christian church is a house church, the Dura-Europos church, founded between 233 and 256.[4]

During the 11th through 14th centuries, a wave of building of cathedrals and smaller parish churches occurred across Western Europe. In addition to being a place of worship, the cathedral or parish church was used by the community in other ways. It could serve as a meeting place for guilds or a hall for banquets. Mystery plays were sometimes performed in cathedrals, and cathedrals might also be used for fairs. The church could be used as a place to thresh and store grain.[5]

A common architecture for churches is the shape of a cross (a long central rectangle, with side rectangles, and a rectangle in front for the altar space or sanctuary). These churches also often have a dome or other large vaulted space in the interior to represent or draw attention to the heavens. Other common shapes for churches include a circle, to represent eternity, or an octagon or similar star shape, to represent the church's bringing light to the world. Another common feature is the spire, a tall tower on the "west" end of the church or over the crossing.

The Latin word basilica (derived from Greek, Basilik Sto, Royal Stoa) was originally used to describe a Roman public building (as in Greece, mainly a tribunal), usually located in the forum of a Roman town.[6][7]

After the Roman Empire became officially Christian, the term came by extension to refer to a large and important church that has been given special ceremonial rights by the Pope. Thus the word retains two senses today, one architectural and the other ecclesiastical.

A cathedral is a church, usually Roman Catholic, Anglican, Oriental Orthodox or Eastern Orthodox, housing the seat of a bishop. The word cathedral takes its name from cathedra, or Bishop's Throne (In Latin: ecclesia cathedralis). The term is sometimes (improperly) used to refer to any church of great size.

A church that has the function of cathedral is not necessarily a large building. It might be as small as Christ Church Cathedral in Oxford, England, Sacred Heart Cathedral in Raleigh, United States, or Chur Cathedral in Switzerland. However, frequently, the cathedral along with some of the abbey churches, was the largest building in any region.

Old and disused church buildings can be seen as an interesting proposition for developers as the architecture and location often provide for attractive homes[8][9] or city centre entertainment venues[10] On the other hand, many newer Churches have decided to host meetings in public buildings such as schools,[11] universities,[12] cinemas[13] or theatres.[14]

There is another trend to convert old buildings for worship rather than face the construction costs and planning difficulties of a new build. Unusual venues in the UK include an old Tram power station,[15] a former bus garage,[16] an old cinema and bingo hall,[17] a former Territorial Army Drill Hall,[18] a former synagogue[19] and a windmill.

There has been an increase in partnerships between church management and private real estate companies to redevelop church properties into mixed uses. While it has garnered criticism from some, the partnership offers congregations the opportunity to increase revenue while preserving the property.[20]

Read the original post:
Church (building) - Wikipedia

Make sure your church gets the most out of its remodeling budget! WBC Development is a trusted and experienced church builder who will assist you with the entire process of your church remodeling project, from beginning to end. Well keep your project within budget so you get the most out of your remodeling dollars. With WBC, you can count on open communication, unsurpassed professionalism, and a hassle-free experience. Learn more about WBCs church remodeling. Sharing your vision of a cost-efficient church design and church remodeling Whether you need a church remodel, addition, childrens or youth area, WBC Development can help. You can be assured that the church building that your congregation envisions is built with professionalism and passion. Surprise costs, delays, and the fear of going over budget make building a new church remodeling or repurposing overwhelming. Put your worries at ease with WBC Development, a church builder who communicates and cares. Learn more about WBCs church design and church building. Professional church project management eliminates risks and hassles WBC Development brings together all the necessary components to make sure your church building or remodeling goes as smoothly as planned. You get a project manager who sees the build process through, from conception to completion, and brings the architects, engineers, and builders together to ensure that your congregation gets the church it desires. Learn more about WBCs church project management. Are you planning to remodel your church?

Read the original:
Church Builders | Church Contractors | Texas

The North Carolina Annual Conference is in a unique position when it comes to helping your congregation when in need for construction/renovation project assistance. Through the NC Conference Board of Missions Incorporated, our Conference is itself, a licensed General Contractor within the State of North Carolina.

No project is too large or too small for us to be in consultation with you, and through our construction consultant, we can assist you with total new construction, new additions, renovations and historic preservation.

What makes us unique is that we attempt, where possible, to blend the use of professional sub-contractors with volunteers arranging with you to tap into the volunteer pool within your own congregation, or from other church communities beyond. We view this as an opportunity for mission outreach and connectional growth.

Whether you are in a position to raise all of the funds you need, or need to take advantage of loan opportunities through the Conference or traditional lender, our general policy is to offer a compensation program that could significant lower the congregations construction costs.

A vision of possibility

The Board of Missions Incorporated, also offers a very competitive revolving-loan ministry. Loan rates are competitive and fixed. The only additional cost borne by the congregation is the loan filing cost with your local county. Typically these fees are less than $50. Also, there are no penalties for early loan pay-off. All proceeds from interest charged are rolled back into the construction ministry.

In addition to offering construction oversight, we do strive to be a good host in partnership with the congregation doing the building and in providing a hospitable environment for out-of Conference individual and group volunteers.

You can learn more about the NC Conference construction ministry and see updates on the latest jobs at

For more information, please feel free to contact the Board of Missions at: Church Construction Ministry

800-849-4433 ext 256 or contact Kathy Duncan at kduncan@nccumc.org

See the original post here:
Church Construction Ministry - NC Conference

A recent study by the Rainer Group of over 300 recently completed church building programs highlighted in their report the benefit of completing a feasibility study prior to construction.

Their study validates and reinforces the need for careful pre-construction planning that we repeat over and over again in our ebook. Planning that most churches just are just not equipped to complete in a timely, objective and accurate manner.

It's Not the Church's Fault...

This is just not something that most churches have the necessary experience to do themselves. Ultimately a feasibility study does not have to cost the church anything.

It Needs to be Done...

But if you were honest with yourself, you would probably agree that as a whole, your church leadership team does not have the practical experience or training to do an effective and objective analysis.

There's Too Much at Risk...

Hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars are on the line, not to mention the effectiveness and the well-being of your ministry. Learn more about a feasibility study for your church and how it will save you time, money, stress and effort.

Read the original:
Church Construction - Building your New Church