23-01-2012 09:12 Hirco HPG Chennai Construction update video December 2011
Read more here:
Hirco HPG Chennai Construction update video December 2011 - Video
23-01-2012 09:12 Hirco HPG Chennai Construction update video December 2011
Read more here:
Hirco HPG Chennai Construction update video December 2011 - Video
With an emptiness in his eyes, David Santiago watched as thick, black smoke billowed from his Lancaster Township apartment building Sunday evening.
With the bulk of the flames knocked down, the damage was unmistakable — and unimaginable.
"I've lost everything," Santiago said, staring blankly at the charred remains of the first-floor apartment he shared with his mother.
"I don't even know what to say. I'm numb. I can't believe it."
Just before 5 p.m., county dispatch received multiple calls reporting a fire at the River Park Gardens complex in the 1100 block of East Orange Street, across from the former Community Hospital of Lancaster.
Fire crews arrived to find heavy smoke billowing from the building and flames shooting from first- and second-floor windows, Lafayette Deputy Chief Scott Hershey said.
Hershey said smoke from the fire could be seen from the Lafayette fire station on Lincoln Highway, which is about two miles away.
Santiago said he wasn't home when the blaze broke out. He had left a few minutes earlier, but returned home after getting a phone call about the fire.
His mother, his sister and his two young sons — ages 4 and 5 — were in the apartment but were able to escape.
Santiago said his mother was taken to Lancaster General Hospital, but he did not immediately know her condition.
Dave Keens, Lafayette assistant fire chief, said late Sunday that he did not believe the woman's injuries were life-threatening. He said she would remain at Lancaster General overnight for observation.
No other injuries were reported.
Keens said the blaze started in a first-floor apartment — where Santiago lived.
Lafayette Fire Chief Ron Nolt said on Monday that a state police fire marshal was at the scene for an hour or two Sunday night, but the cause was undetermined.
He estimated damage at $150,000 to the apartment building and $50,000 to its contents.
Two of the four apartments in the building were destroyed, with the others sustaining minimal damage, Keens said.
He said the durable construction of the brick structure likely helped confine the blaze to one side of the building.
Keens said all of the occupants of the building — about 15 residents — were being assisted by American Red Cross of the Susquehanna Valley Sunday night.
Lafayette was assisted at the scene by fire units from Lancaster city, Lancaster Township, Eden, Witmer, Ronks, Willow Street and Lampeter.
Reader-submitted photos of the blaze
See the rest here:
Fire destroys apartments
With an emptiness in his eyes, David Santiago watched as thick, black smoke billowed from his Lancaster Township apartment building Sunday evening.
With the bulk of the flames knocked down, the damage was unmistakable — and unimaginable.
"I've lost everything," Santiago said, staring blankly at the charred remains of the first-floor apartment he shared with his mother.
"I don't even know what to say. I'm numb. I can't believe it."
Just before 5 p.m., county dispatch received multiple calls reporting a fire at the River Park Gardens complex in the 1100 block of East Orange Street, across from the former Community Hospital of Lancaster.
Fire crews arrived to find heavy smoke billowing from the building and flames shooting from first- and second-floor windows, Lafayette Deputy Chief Scott Hershey said.
Hershey said smoke from the fire could be seen from the Lafayette fire station on Lincoln Highway, which is about two miles away.
Santiago said he wasn't home when the blaze broke out. He had left a few minutes earlier, but returned home after getting a phone call about the fire.
His mother, his sister and his two young sons — ages 4 and 5 — were in the apartment but were able to escape.
Santiago said his mother was taken to Lancaster General Hospital, but he did not immediately know her condition.
Dave Keens, Lafayette assistant fire chief, said late Sunday that he did not believe the woman's injuries were life-threatening. He said she would remain at Lancaster General overnight for observation.
No other injuries were reported.
Keens said the blaze started in a first-floor apartment — where Santiago lived.
Lafayette Fire Chief Ron Nolt said on Monday that a state police fire marshal was at the scene for an hour or two Sunday night, but the cause was undetermined.
He estimated damage at $150,000 to the apartment building and $50,000 to its contents.
Two of the four apartments in the building were destroyed, with the others sustaining minimal damage, Keens said.
He said the durable construction of the brick structure likely helped confine the blaze to one side of the building.
Keens said all of the occupants of the building — about 15 residents — were being assisted by American Red Cross of the Susquehanna Valley Sunday night.
Lafayette was assisted at the scene by fire units from Lancaster city, Lancaster Township, Eden, Witmer, Ronks, Willow Street and Lampeter.
Reader-submitted photos of the blaze
See the article here:
Fire destroys Lancaster Township apartments
1 March is bringing changes to all homeowners who are undertaking significant building or renovation work.
Changes to the Building Act mean that from the start of next month, all critical building work must be done or supervised by licensed building practitioners (LBPs). This type of work includes foundations, framing, roofing and cladding in residential homes, as well as active fire safety systems in small-to-medium-sized apartment buildings.
"For homeowners, the change means they must make sure that any work done is handled by an LBP, and they submit a copy of the LBP memorandum with their building consent application," says Manager Customer and Regulatory Services Simon Pickford.
"The Department of Building and Housing made these changes in the Building Act 2004 to encourage better design and construction.
"When you're looking at building or renovating, the first question a homeowner must ask is if the person they are working with is an LBP."
Professions required to become LBPs include designers, carpenters, roofers, external plasterers, bricklayers and block layers. Registered architects, chartered professional engineers and plumbers are already deemed to be LBPs.
An exemption will be available to owner-builders (DIYers) when the Building Amendment Bill No. 3 has been passed into law.
For more information on the LBP scheme and on how to find a licensed building practitioner, click on the links at the bottom of this page.
How does the LPB scheme affect the building consent process?
From 1 March:
When you submit your building consent application, you will need to include a memorandum (certificate of work) from an LBP certifying that the design work complies with the Building Code. Otherwise, your application will not be accepted.
Restricted work cannot start and inspection will not be accepted until the Council has been advised, in writing, of the relevant LBP who will be doing the work.
When your building work is completed, you will need to include the memorandum (record of building work) from your trade LBPs with your application for a code compliance certificate (CCC). Otherwise, your CCC may not be issued.
Read the original post:
Building Act changes coming for homeowners
The long downward slide in housing construction may be coming to an end.
While the rate of new building remains well below prerecession levels, construction permits for new housing increased slowly, but steadily, most of last year.
Not only is the housing market improving; it is also changing, with fewer single-family homes being built, and more apartment buildings.
Prior to the housing collapse, five to six times more single-family homes than apartment buildings were built each year. Today, the ratio is about three to one. If the trend continues, the housing market may be taking a radically different shape.
Housing has been a major drag on the economy since it collapsed. From early 2006, when the market peaked, to June 2009, when the recession ended, the pace of housing construction fell 75 percent.
In 2009, the number of new single-family homes completed dropped to 500,000, from a high of 1.9 million in 2006. For all housing units, including single-family and multiunit dwellings, the fall was similarly dramatic - from 2.2 million to 800,000.
Trends in housing construction are reflected in the interplay between new building permits and completed units. The number of permits issued approximates the number of new homes planned. But not all permits lead to completed houses. Even in the best of times, some buildings never get started and others are delayed.
When the market is booming, the number of permits is slightly above the number of units completed each month. This indicates confidence in future demand for homes.
The picture is different in a crisis. From mid-2006 to the end of 2009, applications for building permits dropped precipitously. Since some construction was already under way when housing collapsed, it made sense to complete many of those buildings. As a result, the number of permits issued fell below the number of housing units completed. This is a sign that builders are cutting back on planned construction, a symptom of oversupply in the market.
The slide in home building moderated at the end of the recession, but it has not yet recovered. Now the tide seems to be turning.
As of the end of last year, the number of housing units completed no longer exceeded the number of permits issued. Builders are applying for new permits and completing projects at about the same rate.
This rate is much lower today than it was prior to the recession, but we are no longer in crisis mode.
Housing construction has finally started to add to the overall growth in output - another sign of normalcy. New residential investment contributed positively, if modestly, to economic growth during the last three quarters of 2011. We have not seen growth of this kind since 2005.
Most of the increase in housing permits came from the construction of new apartment buildings. The number of new permits for multiunit structures has doubled since mid-2009, and permits exceed completions by a healthy margin. Nevertheless, apartments, like single-family homes, are still being built at a lower rate than prior to the recession, with about 150,000 multiunit buildings completed last year, compared with 280,000 units in 2006.
By contrast, the much larger single-family segment of the housing market still hasn't stabilized much. The number of new permits for single-family homes has stayed virtually constant since mid-2009, and the number of homes completed still slightly exceeds permits. This implies that builders are planning to build even fewer houses than they're building now.
Part of the reason is the large number of single-family homes already on the market. In December 2011, 2.1 million single-family homes were for sale - only slightly fewer than the 2.2 million available during the boom year of 2005. Back then, business was brisk. The demand today is much lower.
Housing construction may have turned the corner, but the new road appears to be headed for a high-rise apartment complex, not a neighborhood of neatly trimmed lawns.
Polina Vlasenko is a research fellow at the American Institute for Economic Research.
See the article here:
Housing market is coming back in a different form
The Charlottesville City Planning Commission approved initial plans this week for a two-phase construction of a 300-unit apartment complex on the corner of Arlington Blvd. and Millmont St, near the Barracks Road Shopping Center.
Peak Campus Development, the company heading the project, hopes to begin construction this May, Peak Campus Development spokesperson Jeff Githens said.
The complex will be built in two phases. The first calls for the demolition of existing physical structures, to be replaced by a 230-unit complex with an attached parking garage. In the second stage of construction, the developers plan to build 70 additional residential units. When complete, the development will house nearly 600 residents, likely graduate students.
“We’re proposing to build a Class A apartment building with high conductivity to its surroundings,” Githens said. “[The building] is optimally situated between shopping centers in Charlottesville for access to both retail and to U.Va.”
Three medical offices currently occupy the space: Jefferson Trial Behavioral System, Region Ten Community Services and the University of Virginia Psychology Department.
The first phase of construction will displace the Jefferson Trial Behavioral System and Region Ten Community Services. Offices rented by the University Psychology Department will remain occupied until August 2014, when the second phase of construction begins.
Peak Campus Development aims to create “better pedestrian interaction with the building and [accommodation for] additional entrances,” and “improve the façade appearance at street level.”
A required traffic survey showed the effect of the project on traffic patterns near the complex.
“[Findings] indicate that the project will have a lower impact on area traffic than the existing use,” said Ebony Walden, a project planner for Charlottesville’s Department of Neighborhood Development.
The project plans are designed to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards, Walden said. The complex will also feature bicycle storage and will be located along a bicycle path and a bus route.
“Alternate transportation is important to us and to the city,” Githens said. “We want to be as environmentally friendly as we can to optimize the use of utilities.”
Walden said she hopes the development will be an asset to the city.
“I hope it will encourage walkability, increase commercial activity in the Barrack’s Road Shopping Center and provide new housing options to Charlottesville’s students and residents,” Walden said.
Peak Campus Development also plans to make a donation of $360,000 to the City’s housing fund to promote affordable housing initiatives throughout Charlottesville.
Read more here:
Apartments near Barracks Road likely to house nearly 600 graduate students; construction to begin this May
by DEREK KRAVITZ - Feb. 16, 2012 07:00 AM
AP Real Estate Writer
WASHINGTON - -- Construction of single-family homes cooled off slightly in January after surging in the final month last year. But a rebound in volatile apartment construction kept builders busy and pushed housing starts to their highest level in more than three years.
The Commerce Department said Thursday that builders broke ground on a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 699,000 homes in January. That's up 1.5 percent from December and the highest level since October 2008.
Construction began on 508,000 single-family homes last month. That's a 1 percent drop from December and the first decline in four months.
Still, December single-family homes were revised up strongly to show builders started 513,000 homes -- a 12 percent gain from November.
Apartment building, a more volatile category, jumped 14.4 percent. Building permits, a gauge of future construction, rose 0.7 percent.
Single-family home construction rose in each of the final three months of last year, bringing the pace of those starts to the highest level since April 2010. The modest but steady gains helped boost confidence among builders after the worst year for single-family home construction on record.
Still, the critical gauge of the housing market's health has a long way to go before most declare a full recovery is under way. The current pace is less than half the rate in which those homes went up during the 1990s. And it's only one-quarter of the 1.82 million single-family homes that builders started in January 2006, at the peak of the housing boom.
Most analysts say it could be years before the industry is fully recovered from the damage caused by the housing bust.
Builders are starting to see some signs of progress.
A measure of builder sentiment has risen for five straight months and is now at its highest level in nearly five years. Many builders are seeing more people express interest in buying a home, leading them to believe 2012 could be a turn-around year for the market. Mortgage rates have never been cheaper. And home sales started to rise at the end of last year.
Yet for all their optimism, builders began only 428,600 single-family homes last year. It was the fewest on records dating back a half-century. And home prices are still falling.
Though new homes represent just 20 percent of the overall home market, they have an outsize impact on the economy. Each home built creates an average of three jobs for a year and generates about $90,000 in taxes, according to the National Association of Home Builders.
Builders are struggling to compete with deeply discounted foreclosures and short sales -- when lenders allow homes to be sold for less than what's owed on the mortgage.
After previous recessions, housing accounted for at least 15 percent of U.S. economic growth. Since the recession officially ended in June 2009, it has contributed just 4 percent.
Another reason sales have fallen is that previously occupied homes have become a better deal than new homes. The median price of a new home is about 30 percent higher than the median price for a re-sale. That's nearly twice the markup typical in a healthy housing market.
Read the rest here:
US housing starts rise modestly to start new year
Construction of single-family homes cooled off slightly in January after surging in the final month last year. But a rise in permits suggests builders are growing more confident that more buyers are ready to come off the sidelines.
The Commerce Department said Thursday that builders broke ground on a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 699,000 homes in January. That's up 1.5 percent from December and nearly matches November's three-year high for starts.
Construction crews began work on 508,000 single-family homes last month. That's a 1 percent drop from December and the first decline in four months. A big rise in volatile apartment construction helped offset the decline in single-family homes.
Still, December single-family homes were revised up strongly to show builders started 513,000 homes — a 12 percent gain from November.
And building permits, a gauge of future construction, rose 0.7 percent. The majority of those permits were for single-family homes. It can take 12 months for a builder to obtain a permit and construct a single-family home.
Single-family home construction rose in each of the final three months of last year, bringing the pace of those starts to the highest level since April 2010. The modest but steady gains helped boost confidence among builders after the worst year for single-family home construction on record.
"The upturn in permits and starts in recent months has been consistent with the surge in the ... survey of homebuilders, which has surprised the markets to the upside for five straight months," said Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics. "The new home sales numbers have not yet responded but builders seem confident that if they build, buyers will come."
The critical gauge of the housing market's health has a long way to go before most declare a full recovery is under way. The current pace is less than half the rate in which those homes went up during the 1990s. And it's only one-quarter of the 1.82 million single-family homes that builders started in January 2006, at the peak of the housing boom.
Most analysts say it could be years before the industry is fully recovered from the damage caused by the housing bust.
Builders are starting to see some signs of progress.
A measure of builder sentiment has risen for five straight months and is now at its highest level in nearly five years. Many builders are seeing more people express interest in buying a home, leading them to believe 2012 could be a turn-around year for the market. Mortgage rates have never been cheaper. And home sales started to rise at the end of last year.
Yet for all their optimism, builders began just 430,900 single-family homes last year. It was the fewest on records dating back a half-century. And home prices are still falling.
Though new homes represent just 20 percent of the overall home market, they have an outsize impact on the economy. Each home built creates an average of three jobs for a year and generates about $90,000 in taxes, according to the National Association of Home Builders.
Builders are struggling to compete with deeply discounted foreclosures and short sales — when lenders allow homes to be sold for less than what's owed on the mortgage.
After previous recessions, housing accounted for at least 15 percent of U.S. economic growth. Since the recession officially ended in June 2009, it has contributed just 4 percent.
Another reason sales have fallen is that previously occupied homes have become a better deal than new homes. The median price of a new home is about 30 percent higher than the median price for a re-sale. That's nearly twice the markup typical in a healthy housing market.
--The Associated Press
The rest is here:
New home construction rises 1.5 percent on budding apartment projects
A four-level, 42-unit apartment building is just too much development on a Sutherland Avenue lot less than an acre in size, according to the owner of adjoining property. But the Metropolitan Planning Commission says the developer has variances in place to allow construction.
MPC has given unanimous approval to a use-on-review review request by Hatcher Hill Properties LLC to build an apartment building on a 0.84-acre lot on the northwest corner of Sutherland Avneue at Concord Street, providing that applicant Tim Hill secures two more variances from the Knoxville Board of Zoning Appeals.
Richard Cadmus, who owns property bordering the lot to the west, told MPC last week that jamming the project onto such a small lot will hurt the value of his property, which contains a commercial building.
Cadmus said MPC was allowing what amounted to a rezoning of the property through variances to a higher level of development than its actual zoning allows. However, during the planning commission's meeting Feb. 9, MPC Vice Chairman Bart Carey told him that MPC has to accept variances that developers are able to get through the zoning board.
"Those variances are in place and they are what we have to start with," Carey told Cadmus.
Tom Brechko, an MPC planner who reviewed the proposal, told MPC commissioners that the developer has received four variances so far: Reducing the front yard setback requirement on Concord Street from 25 feet to 17.5 feet, reducing the southwest side yard setback from 12 feet to 9 feet, reducing the front yard setback on Sutherland Avenue from 25 feet to five feet and reducing the minimum parking structure requirement from 58,000 square feet to 35,960 square feet.
However, Hill will need two more variances on other issues before MPC can sign off on the proposal, Brechko said. One is that the building may not cover more than 30 percent of its lot. The proposed building would cover 55 percent. The other issue is that the development would be required to have 16,800 square feet of usable open space but it only has 2,000 square feet.
If Hill is unable to get approval for the two variances, he will have to appear before MPC with a revised plan, Brechko said. Cadmus said he will oppose the variance requests when they come before the Board of Zoning Appeals. Cadmus said that, at one point, he had offered to sell his property to Hill but the two could not agree on a price.
Go here to see the original:
MPC approves 42 apartments on Sutherland Ave. lot
Wednesday, February 15, 2012 Last updated: Thursday February 16, 2012, 1:59 AM
BY KATHRYN A. BURGER
The Park Ridge Planning Board has approved the construction of a fifth apartment building at the Ridge Manor Apartments located at 71-91 Hawthorne Ave. The approved plan complies with all borough codes, with one exception. A variance was needed to allow the front of the new building to be 23.3 feet from the front of an existing building; the zoning ordinance calls for a minimum of 60 feet.
STAFF PHOTO BY KATHRYN A. BURGER
The Park Ridge Planning Board recently approved the construction of a fifth building at the Ridge Manor Apartments, 71-91 Hawthorne Ave. The four existing buildings, portions of which are pictured here, face west. The new building will be located partially in this open lawn area and will face the existing buildings.
There are currently four, two-story buildings on the site, with a total of 44 apartments. The buildings all face west. The new building, which will have 12 units and be similar in style and appearance to the existing buildings, will face east and be situated adjacent to the existing parking area, located along the westernmost border of the property. According to the minutes of the Nov. 16, 2011 Planning Board, William Hamilton, a New Jersey-licensed planner, speaking on behalf of the applicant, stated "that there would be no negative impact whatsoever resulting from the proposal, since the changes were made to the interior of the site and would not be visible from surrounding properties." The existing buildings are staggered on the property that, the board noted, is nearly twice the size required by code.
There will also be an affordable housing unit created in an existing building.
The plan includes drainage improvements that will reduce the amount of runoff from the site; new fire hydrants; additional handicapped parking spaces, additional sidewalk ramps and other enhancements.
According to Lyn Beer, the borough's land use administrator, the borough recently received the developer's agreement for the project. Once that is executed, the Mayor and Council need to approve it, which she said, was "pro forma" since it will have already been approved by the Planning Board. Beer said the paperwork won't be completed until sometime in March and that there is no timetable as yet for the construction phase of the project.
Email: burger@northjersey.com
Continued here:
New building approved at Ridge Manor Apartments in Park Ridge