Everyone attending Monday nights Upper Moreland Township public hearing on a proposed apartment building on Davisville Road agreed the new construction would be a positive step toward revitalizing the area.

The only major point of contention between the commissioners and the developers of the Lofts at Davisville involved the number of sufficient parking spaces.

kAm%96 AC@A@D2= @776C65 3J AC@A6CEJ @H?6C ry$ t?E6CAC:D6D 42==65 7@C 2 f_F?:E 3F:=5:?8 4@?D:DE:?8 @7 2 >:I @7 @?6 2?5 EH@365C@@> 2A2CE>6?ED 2?5 2 `_dDA246 A2C<:?8 =@E[ H:E9 `]d DA246D A6C F?:E] %@H?D9:A @C5:?2?46 C6BF:C6D 2 EH@DA246 A6C F?:E DE2?52C5[ 3FE 2 C6BF6DE 7@C 2 ad A6C46?E C65F4E:@? :D ?@E F?4@>>@?[ D2:5 &AA6C |@C6=2?5 D@=:4:E@C z2E6 w2CA6C]k^Am

kAm!2C<:?8 :D 2 >2;@C 4@?46C? 7@C >6[ D2:5 3@2C5 !C6D:56?E $2> '2=6?K2] x7 D@>6@?6 92D 2 A2CEJ[ E96C6D 8@:?8 E@ 36 2? @G6C7=@H @7 42CD] (96C6 2C6 E96J 8@:?8 E@ 8@nk^Am

kAmu@==@H:?8 2 EH@9@FC 962C:?8[ E96 3@2C5 F=E:>2E6=J 2AAC@G65 E96 4@?5:E:@?2= FD6 2AA=:42E:@? 7@C E96 {@7ED 2E s2G:DG:==6 ๐Ÿ˜• 2 d_ G@E6 H:E9 EH@ 23DE6?E:@?D[ 3FE ?@E H:E9@FE 2 4@FA=6 @7 2>6?5>6?ED] u:CDE[ :?DE625 @7 E96 AC@A@D65 `]d DA246D[ E96 A2C<:?8 DA@ED H@F=5 36 5@=65 @FE 2D @?6 DA246 A6C 365C@@>]k^Am

kAm%96 D64@?5 2>6?5>6?E ๐Ÿ˜€ 2 =:EE=6 >@C6 @A6?6?565 2?5 C6BF:C6D E96 AC@A6CEJ @H?6CD E@ 56>@?DEC2E6 E96 42A24:EJ E@ 6?E6C :?E@ 2? 28C66>6?E H:E9 ?6:893@C:?8 3FD:?6DD6D @G6C D92C:?8 DA246D 7@C @G6C7=@H A2C<:?8 :7 E96 E@H?D9:A C6BF:C6D :E 2E 2?J A@:?E :? E96 7FEFC6]k^Am

kAmx E9:?< E92ED 8@:?8 E@ 36 2 5:77:4F=E C6BF:C6>6?E E@ 6?7@C46[ D2:5 s6??:D $2<6=D@?[ @7 ry$ t?E6CAC:D6D] ~?6 J62C :?E@ @A6C2E:@?[ :7 H6 92G6 @?6 @44FCC6?46 @7 @G6C7=@H[ H6== DF556?=J ?665 E@ 7:?5 2 A2C<:?8 A2CE?6C]k^Am

kAm#682C5=6DD @7 E96 2>6?5>6?E[ $2<6=D@? 2?5 2C49:E64E pCE9FC p52>D C6>2:? 4@?7:56?E E92E E96 ?6H 3F:=5:?8 H:== C6AC6D6?E 2 EFC?:?8 A@:?E ๐Ÿ˜• E96 |@?E8@>6CJ r@F?EJ 4@>>:DD:@?6CD 677@CED E@ C6G:E2=:K6 E96 (:==@H vC@G6 2C62]k^Am

kAm%9:D ๐Ÿ˜€ 2 8@@5 AC@;64E 7@C E96 2C62[ D2:5 p52>D] xE H:== 36 2 <6JDE@?6 7@C E96 2C62D C656G6=@A>6?E]k^Am

kAm%96 {@7ED 2E s2G:DG:==6 92G6 366? AC@A@D65 2D 2 EC2?D:E@C:6?E65 56G6=@A>6?E] p44@C5:?8 E@ E96 AC6D6?E2E:@? 3J p52>D[ E96 4@>A=6I H:== 36 =@42E65 =6DD E92? `[e__ 766E 7C@> $t!%pD (:==@H vC@G6 DE2E:@? 2?5 H:E9:? H2=<:?8 5:DE2?46 E@ E96 G:==286 46?E6C] %96 4=@D6 AC@I:>:EJ H:== ?@E @?=J 96=A <66A E96 42C G@=F>6 =@H ๐Ÿ˜• E96 A2C<:?8 =@E[ $2<6=D@? E@=5 E96 3@2C5[ 3FE 2=D@ 96=A E@ 6?4@FC286 >@C6 A656DEC:2? EC277:4 2C@F?5 E@H? 2?5 2EEC24E ?6H 3FD:?6DD6D E@ E96 2C62]k^Am

Read the original post:
UM apartment plans moved forward

Related Posts
August 7, 2014 at 10:55 pm by Mr HomeBuilder
Category: Apartment Building Construction